Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep-Oct;24(5):605-9.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110034.

A novel protocol for streamlined IRB review of Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) card studies

Affiliations

A novel protocol for streamlined IRB review of Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) card studies

Michelle D Hamilton et al. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The "card study," in which clinicians record brief information about patient visits during usual clinical care, has long been a rapid method for conducting descriptive studies in practice-based research networks. Because an increasingly stringent regulatory environment has made conducting card studies difficult, we developed a streamlined method for obtaining card study institutional review board (IRB) approval.

Methods: We developed a protocol for a study of the card study method, allowing new card study proposals of specific research questions to be submitted as addenda to the approved Card Study Protocol.

Results: Seven card studies were proposed and approved under the Card Study Protocol during the first year after implementation, contrasted with one-card study proposed in the previous year. New card study ideas submitted as addenda to an approved protocol appeared to increase IRB comfort with the card study as a minimal risk method while reducing the hurdles to developing new study ideas.

Conclusions: A Card Study Protocol allowing new study questions to be submitted as addenda decreases time between idea generation and IRB approval. Shortened turn-around times may be useful for translating ideas into action while reducing regulatory burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicting or competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of developmental delays card study data collection card.

Similar articles

References

    1. Green LA, Fryer GE, Jr, Yawn BP, Lanier D, Dovey SM. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):2021–2025. - PubMed
    1. Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT, editors. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 2000. pp. 65–70. - PubMed
    1. Nutting PA, Green LA. Practice-based research networks: reuniting practice and research around the problems most of the people have most of the time. J Fam Pract. 1994;38(4):335–336. - PubMed
    1. Fortin M, Dionne J, Pinho G, Gignac J, Almirall J, Lapointe L. Randomized controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities? Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;4(2):104–108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nutting PA. Practice-based research: laboratories for outcomes and effectiveness research. Paper presented at: AHCPR Conference Proceedings. Primary Care Research: Theory and Methods; 1991; Washington, D.C.

Publication types

MeSH terms