A survey study of sedation training in advanced pediatric dentistry programs: thoughts of program directors and students

Pediatr Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):353-60.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to survey program directors and students of advanced pediatric dentistry training programs in the United States on sedation issues.

Methods: Surveys were sent to the target audiences. Questions contained response categories ranging from fill-in-the-blank, Likert-order scale style, and categorical. The surveys resided on SurveyMonkey. A cover letter emphasizing such issues as anonymity of responses was sent via e-mail to participants using the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry listserv. The responses were downloaded and subsequently analyzed using SPSS statistical software.

Results: Data were obtained from 49% of program directors and 17% of students. Experience with different routes of sedative administration varied from "none" (even with the oral route) to "significant." Oral midazolam was the most-often used route and sedative. Restraint was reportedly used by the majority of programs.

Conclusions: Strategies should be developed to strengthen consistency of competencies in sedation practices across academic training programs.

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesiology / education*
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Benzodiazepines / administration & dosage
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Clinical Competence
  • Conscious Sedation / methods
  • Conscious Sedation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Dentists / statistics & numerical data
  • Education, Dental, Graduate
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage
  • Pediatric Dentistry / education*
  • Restraint, Physical / statistics & numerical data
  • Students, Dental / statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Benzodiazepines