Validity of self-reported measures of workplace sitting time and breaks in sitting time
- PMID: 21926535
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821820a2
Validity of self-reported measures of workplace sitting time and breaks in sitting time
Abstract
Purpose: To understand the prevalence and potential health effect of prolonged workplace sedentary (sitting) time, valid measures are required. Here, we examined the criterion validity of a brief self-reported measure of workplace sitting time and breaks in sitting time.
Methods: An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to assess workplace sitting time (h·d(-1)) and breaks from sitting per hour at work in a convenience sample of 121 full-time workers (36% men, mean age = 37 yr, 53% office based). These self-reported measures were compared with accelerometer-derived sedentary time (hours per day, <100 counts per minute) and breaks per sedentary hour (number of times, ≥100 counts per minute) during work hours.
Results: Self-reported sitting time was significantly correlated with accelerometer-derived sedentary time (Pearson r = 0.39, 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.53), with an average sitting time 0.45 h·d(-1) higher than average sedentary time. Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis showed positive associations between the difference in sitting and sedentary time and the average of sitting and sedentary time (mean difference = -2.75 h + 0.47 × average sitting and sedentary time; limits of agreement = ±2.25 h·d(-1)). The correlation of self-reported breaks per sitting hour with accelerometer-derived breaks per sedentary hour was also statistically significant (Spearman rs = 0.26, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-0.44).
Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the criterion validity of an interviewer-administered questionnaire measure of workplace sitting time and breaks in sitting time using objective criterion measures. The workplace sitting measure has acceptable properties for use in observational studies concerned with sedentary behavior in groups of workers; however, the wide limits of agreement suggest caution in estimating individuals' sitting time with high precision. Using self-reported measures to capture patterns of workplace sitting (such as breaks in sitting time) requires further development.
Similar articles
-
Social-ecological correlates of accelerometer-measured occupational sitting among Japanese desk-based workers.BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1489. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7782-1. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31703665 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity of self-reported sitting and breaks from sitting in the workplace.J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jul;21(7):697-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.030. Epub 2017 Nov 7. J Sci Med Sport. 2018. PMID: 29249686
-
[Validity and reliability of the Work-related Physical Activity Questionnaire for assessing intensity-specific physical activity and sedentary behavior in the workplace].Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020 Mar 25;62(2):61-71. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-013-B. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020. PMID: 31474688 Japanese.
-
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6:CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4 PMID: 26984326 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review.Digit Health. 2020 Feb 10;6:2055207620905418. doi: 10.1177/2055207620905418. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 32095261 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sitting Less, Recovering Faster: Investigating the Relationship between Daily Sitting Time and Muscle Recovery following Intense Exercise: A Pilot Study.J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Jan 29;9(1):24. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010024. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024. PMID: 38390924 Free PMC article.
-
Impact assessment of e-trainings in occupational safety and health: a literature review.BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):1187. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16114-8. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37340453 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Psychometric properties of the Last-7-Day Sedentary Time Questionnaire (SIT-Q-7d): Testing the validity and reliability among general population.BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):1880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14262-x. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36209048 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of an intervention for reducing sitting time and improving health in office workers: three arm cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2022 Aug 17;378:e069288. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069288. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35977732 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Validity of Three Survey Questions for Self-Assessed Sedentary Time.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4269. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074269. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35409948 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
