Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;41(10):428-33.
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822eddbc.

Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals

Lesly A Kelly et al. J Nurs Adm. 2011 Oct.

Erratum in

  • J Nurs Adm. 2012 Jan;42(1):33

Abstract

The important goals of Magnet hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P < .05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Republished in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drenkard K. The business case for Magnet. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(6):263–271. - PubMed
    1. Trinkoff A, Johantgen M, Storr C, et al. A comparison of working conditions among nurses in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(7–8):309–315. - PubMed
    1. Aiken L, Havens D, Sloane D. The Magnet nursing services recognition program: a comparison of two groups of Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2000;39 suppl 7/8:S5–S14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lake E, Friese C. Variations in nursing practice environments: relation to staffing and hospital characteristics. Nurs Res. 2006;55(1):1–9. - PubMed
    1. McClure M, Poulin M, Sovie M, Wandelt M. Magnet Hospitals: Attraction and Retention of Professional Nurses. Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Nurses; 1983. pp. 1–135. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms