Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances
- PMID: 21946239
- PMCID: PMC3341776
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000209
Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances
Abstract
Objective: To better understand barriers associated with the adoption and use of electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS), a practice recently established by US Drug Enforcement Administration regulation.
Materials and methods: Prescribers of controlled substances affiliated with a regional health system were surveyed regarding current electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) activities, current prescribing of controlled substances, and expectations and barriers to the adoption of EPCS.
Results: 246 prescribers (response rate of 64%) represented a range of medical specialties, with 43.1% of these prescribers current users of e-prescribing for non-controlled substances. Reported issues with controlled substances included errors, pharmacy call-backs, and diversion; most prescribers expected EPCS to address many of these problems, specifically reduce medical errors, improve work flow and efficiency of practice, help identify prescription diversion or misuse, and improve patient treatment management. Prescribers expected, however, that it would be disruptive to practice, and over one-third of respondents reported that carrying a security authentication token at all times would be so burdensome as to discourage adoption.
Discussion: Although adoption of e-prescribing has been shown to dramatically reduce medication errors, challenges to efficient processes and errors still persist from the perspective of the prescriber, that may interfere with the adoption of EPCS. Most prescribers regarded EPCS security measures as a small or moderate inconvenience (other than carrying a security token), with advantages outweighing the burden.
Conclusion: Prescribers are optimistic about the potential for EPCS to improve practice, but view certain security measures as a burden and potential barrier.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association of Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances With Opioid Prescribing Rates.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27951. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33346845 Free PMC article.
-
Early experience with electronic prescribing of controlled substances in a community setting.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e44-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001499. Epub 2013 Apr 5. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23564630 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 12. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013. PMID: 22695213
-
The effect of prescriber education on medication-related patient harm in the hospital: a systematic review.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 May;83(5):953-961. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13200. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 27918623 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital Health in Physicians' and Pharmacists' Office: A Comparative Study of e-Prescription Systems' Architecture and Digital Security in Eight Countries.OMICS. 2021 Feb;25(2):102-122. doi: 10.1089/omi.2020.0085. Epub 2020 Sep 15. OMICS. 2021. PMID: 32931378 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39300456 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' Perspectives with the E-prescribing System in Five Teaching Hospitals.Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):428-436. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786872. Epub 2024 May 29. Appl Clin Inform. 2024. PMID: 38810656
-
Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x. Implement Sci. 2024. PMID: 38347525 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Experiences and Outcomes of Using e-Prescribing for Opioids: Rapid Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 28;25:e49173. doi: 10.2196/49173. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 38153776 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances With Opioid Prescribing Rates.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27951. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33346845 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501–4 - PubMed
-
- IOM report Preventing medication errors. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11623&page=R1 (accessed 29 Jul 2010).
-
- eHealth Initiative Electronic Prescribing: Toward Maximum Value and Rapid Adoption. Washington, DC, 2004. http://www.ehealthinitative.org (accessed 29 Jul 2010).
-
- Kaushal R, Blumenthal D, Poon EG, et al. ; Cost of National Health Information Network Working Group The costs of a national health information network. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:165–73 - PubMed
-
- Gallagher C. Electronic Prescribing. Presentation at the National Association of Controlled Substances Authorities Annual Educational Conference. San Antonio, TX, 2006. http://www.nascsa.org
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
