Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- PMID: 21949031
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473
Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Background: Pressure ulcers are common in many care settings, with adverse health outcomes and high treatment costs. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of evidence-based strategies to improve current prevention practice in long-term care facilities.
Methods: We used a validated Markov model to compare current prevention practice with the following 4 quality improvement strategies: (1) pressure redistribution mattresses for all residents, (2) oral nutritional supplements for high-risk residents with recent weight loss, (3) skin emollients for high-risk residents with dry skin, and (4) foam cleansing for high-risk residents requiring incontinence care. Primary outcomes included lifetime risk of stage 2 to 4 pressure ulcers, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lifetime costs, calculated according to a single health care payer's perspective and expressed in 2009 Canadian dollars (Can$1 = US$0.84).
Results: Strategies cost on average $11.66 per resident per week. They reduced lifetime risk; the associated number needed to treat was 45 (strategy 1), 63 (strategy 4), 158 (strategy 3), and 333 (strategy 2). Strategy 1 and 4 minimally improved QALYs and reduced the mean lifetime cost by $115 and $179 per resident, respectively. The cost per QALY gained was approximately $78 000 for strategy 3 and $7.8 million for strategy 2. If decision makers are willing to pay up to $50 000 for 1 QALY gained, the probability that improving prevention is cost-effective is 94% (strategy 4), 82% (strategy 1), 43% (strategy 3), and 1% (strategy 2).
Conclusions: The clinical and economic evidence supports pressure redistribution mattresses for all long-term care residents. Improving prevention with perineal foam cleansers and dry skin emollients appears to be cost-effective, but firm conclusions are limited by the available clinical evidence.
Similar articles
-
Early prevention of pressure ulcers among elderly patients admitted through emergency departments: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):468-78.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.04.033. Epub 2011 Aug 5. Ann Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 21820208
-
Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program Study: a randomized, controlled prospective comparative value evaluation of 2 pressure ulcer prevention strategies in nursing and rehabilitation centers.Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Oct;25(10):450-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000421461.21773.32. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012. PMID: 22990343 Clinical Trial.
-
A comprehensive program to prevent pressure ulcers in long-term care: exploring costs and outcomes.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Apr;48(4):52-62. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002. PMID: 11993061
-
Pressure ulcers: guideline development and economic modelling.J Adv Nurs. 2005 May;50(3):307-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03394.x. J Adv Nurs. 2005. PMID: 15811110 Review.
-
Systematic mapping review about costs and economic evaluations of skin conditions and diseases in the aged.J Tissue Viability. 2017 Feb;26(1):6-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 25. J Tissue Viability. 2017. PMID: 27544020 Review.
Cited by
-
The Relationship between Nursing Practice Environment and Pressure Ulcer Care Quality in Portugal's Long-Term Care Units.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;11(12):1751. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121751. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372869 Free PMC article.
-
An economic analysis of a wearable patient sensor for preventing hospital-acquired pressure injuries among the acutely ill patients.Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021 Dec;21(4):457-471. doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09304-7. Epub 2021 Apr 9. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021. PMID: 33837491 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a pressure-ulcer audit and feedback regional programme at 1 and 2 years in nursing homes: A prospective longitudinal study.PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233471. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32469916 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of multi-layered silicone foam dressings for prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in high-risk intensive care unit patients: An economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1291-1299. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13390. Epub 2020 May 11. Int Wound J. 2020. PMID: 32391627 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Five-layer border dressings as part of a quality improvement bundle to prevent pressure injuries in US skilled nursing facilities and Australian nursing homes: A cost-effectiveness analysis.Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1263-1272. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13174. Epub 2019 Sep 2. Int Wound J. 2019. PMID: 31475434 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
