Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Nov;26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):689-96.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1849-8.

Interventions to improve veterans' access to care: a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Interventions to improve veterans' access to care: a systematic review of the literature

Shannon M Kehle et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review to address the following key questions: (1) what interventions have been successful in improving access for veterans with reduced health care access? (2) Have interventions that have improved health care access led to improvements in process and clinical outcomes?

Data sources: OVID MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO.

Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 1990 to June 2010. All interventions designed to improve access to health care for US veterans that reported the impact of the intervention on perceived (e.g., satisfaction with access) or objective (e.g., travel time, wait time) access were included. APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Investigators abstracted data on study design, study quality, intervention, and impact of the intervention on access, process outcomes, and clinical outcomes.

Results: Nineteen articles (16 unique studies) met the inclusion criteria. While there were a small number of studies in support of any one intervention, all showed a positive impact on either perceived or objective measures of access. Implementation of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (n = 5 articles), use of Telemedicine (n = 5 articles), and Primary Care Mental Health Integration (n = 6 articles) improved access. All 16 unique studies reported process outcomes, most often satisfaction with care and utilization. Four studies reported clinical outcomes; three found no differences.

Limitations: Included studies were largely of poor to fair methodological quality.

Conclusions and implications of key findings: Interventions can improve access to health care for veterans. Increased access was consistently linked to increased primary care utilization. There was a lack of data regarding the link between access and clinical outcomes; however, the limited data suggest that increased access may not improve clinical outcomes. Future research should focus on the quality and appropriateness of care and clinical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Literature flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2007 National Healthcare Disparities Report. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AHRQ Pub. No. 08–0041, February 2008.
    1. Demakis JG. “Rural Health-Improving Access to Improve Outcomes.” Management Brief, Health Services Research & Development Service, No. 13:1–3, Jan 2000.
    1. Millman M, editor. Access to healthcare in America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1993.
    1. Miller LJ. “Improving Access to Care in the VA Health System: A progress report.” FORUM, VA Health Services Research & Development Service, June 2001.
    1. Fortney J. “A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21stCentury Healthcare.” Oral presentation given to the VA Health Services Research & Development Service Timely Topics of Interest Cyber Seminar Series, August 2010.

Publication types

MeSH terms