Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):179-82.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0844. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

A simple test of vocal individual recognition in wild meerkats

Affiliations

A simple test of vocal individual recognition in wild meerkats

Simon W Townsend et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Individual recognition is thought to be a crucial ability facilitating the evolution of animal societies. Given its central importance, much research has addressed the extent of this capacity across the animal kingdom. Recognition of individuals vocally has received particular attention due, in part, to the insights it provides regarding the cognitive processes that underlie this skill. While much work has focused on vocal individual recognition in primates, there is currently very little data showing comparable skills in non-primate mammals under natural conditions. This may be because non-primate mammal societies do not provide obvious contexts in which vocal individual recognition can be rigorously tested. We addressed this gap in understanding by designing an experimental paradigm to test for individual recognition in meerkats (Suricata suricatta) without having to rely on naturally occurring social contexts. Results suggest that when confronted with a physically impossible scenario-the presence of the same conspecific meerkat in two different places-subjects responded more strongly than during the control, a physically possible setup. We argue that this provides the first clear evidence for vocal individual recognition in wild non-primate mammals and hope that this novel experimental design will allow more systematic cross-species comparisons of individual recognition under natural settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic outlining the playback protocol used in both the (a) incongruent (test) and (b) congruent (control) conditions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Frequency of vigilance and (b) vigilance duration (mean ±1 s.e.) during both the incongruent (test) and congruent (control) experimental conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamilton W. D. 1963. The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am. Nat. 97, 354–35610.1086/497114 (doi:10.1086/497114) - DOI - DOI
    1. Trivers R. L. 1971. Evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–5710.1086/406755 (doi:10.1086/406755) - DOI - DOI
    1. Tibbetts E. A., Dale J. 2007. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 529–53710.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomasello M., Call J. 1997. Primate cognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
    1. Draganoiu T. I., Nagle L., Musseau R., Kreutzer M. 2006. In a songbird, the black redstart, parents use acoustic cues to discriminate between their different fledglings. Anim. Behav. 71, 1039–104610.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.022 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.022) - DOI - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources