Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;50(2):171-8.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822dcf2d.

Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms

Leah S Karliner  1 , Lin Ma, Michael Hofmann, Karla Kerlikowske
Affiliations

Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms

Leah S Karliner et al. Med Care. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is frequently diagnosed after an abnormal mammography result. Language barriers can complicate communication of those results.

Objectives: We evaluated the association of non-English language with delay in follow-up.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of women at 3 mammography facilities participating in the San Francisco Mammography Registry with an abnormal mammogram result from 1997 to 2008. We measured median time from report of abnormal result to first follow-up test.

Results: Of 13,014 women with 16,109 abnormal mammograms, 4027 (31%) had a non-English patient language. Clinical facilities differed in proportion of non-English speakers and in time to first follow-up test: facility A (38%; 25 d), facility B (18%; 14 d), and facility C (51%; 41 d). Most mammography examinations (67%) had breast imaging and reporting data system 0 (incomplete) assessment, requiring radiographic follow-up. At 30 days of follow-up, 67% of all English speakers with incomplete assessments had a follow-up examination compared with 50% of all non-English speakers (P<0.0001). The facility with the least delay and the lowest proportion of non-English speakers, had the biggest difference by language; compared with English speakers and adjusting for education, non-English speakers had twice the odds ratio of >30-day delay in follow-up (odds ratio=2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.9).

Conclusions: There are considerable differences among facilities in delays in diagnostic follow-up of abnormal mammography results. More attention must be paid to understanding mammography facility factors, such as wait time to schedule diagnostic mammography and radiology workload, to improve rates of timely follow-up, particularly for those facilities disproportionately serving vulnerable non-English speaking patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample selection for cohort of women with abnormal mammograms
Figure 2
Figure 2
Delays in follow-up for incomplete exams by clinical site
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Shin H, Bruno R. Language Use and English-Speaking Ability: 2000. [February 9, 2007];2003 Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-29.pdf.
    1. Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y, et al. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1151–1159. - PubMed
    1. Eberl MM, Watroba N, Reinhardt M, et al. Linked claims and medical records for cancer case management : evaluation of mammography abnormalities. Cancer. 2007;110:518–524. - PubMed
    1. Jones BA, Reams K, Calvocoressi L, et al. Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:531–538. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, et al. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:274–284. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms