Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Apr;20(4):756-64.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.293. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

Social support for healthy behaviors: scale psychometrics and prediction of weight loss among women in a behavioral program

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Social support for healthy behaviors: scale psychometrics and prediction of weight loss among women in a behavioral program

Michaela Kiernan et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Social support could be a powerful weight-loss treatment moderator or mediator but is rarely assessed. We assessed the psychometric properties, initial levels, and predictive validity of a measure of perceived social support and sabotage from friends and family for healthy eating and physical activity (eight subscales). Overweight/obese women randomized to one of two 6-month, group-based behavioral weight-loss programs (N = 267; mean BMI 32.1 ± 3.5; 66.3% White) completed subscales at baseline, and weight loss was assessed at 6 months. Internal consistency, discriminant validity, and content validity were excellent for support subscales and adequate for sabotage subscales; qualitative responses revealed novel deliberate instances not reflected in current sabotage items. Most women (>75%) "never" or "rarely" experienced support from friends or family. Using nonparametric classification methods, we identified two subscales-support from friends for healthy eating and support from family for physical activity-that predicted three clinically meaningful subgroups who ranged in likelihood of losing ≥5% of initial weight at 6 months. Women who "never" experienced family support were least likely to lose weight (45.7% lost weight) whereas women who experienced both frequent friend and family support were more likely to lose weight (71.6% lost weight). Paradoxically, women who "never" experienced friend support were most likely to lose weight (80.0% lost weight), perhaps because the group-based programs provided support lacking from friendships. Psychometrics for support subscales were excellent; initial support was rare; and the differential roles of friend vs. family support could inform future targeted weight-loss interventions to subgroups at risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Signal Detection Subgroups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Look Ahead Research Group The Look AHEAD study: A description of the lifestyle intervention and the evidence supporting it. Obesity. 2006;14:737–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perri MG, Limacher MC, Durning PE, et al. Extended-care programs for weight management in rural communities: The treatment of obesity in rural settings. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008;168:2347–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wadden TA, Phelan S. Behavioral assessment of the obese patient. 2002. In: Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, editors. Handbook of Obesity Treatment. Guilford Press; New York: 2002. pp. 186–226.
    1. Black DR, Gleser LJ, Kooyers KJ. A meta-analytic evaluation of couples weight-loss programs. Health Psychology. 1990;9:330–47. - PubMed
    1. Wing RR, Jeffery RW. Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1999;67:132–8. - PubMed

Publication types