Best practices in the Veterans Health Administration's MOVE! Weight management program
- PMID: 22011415
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.047
Best practices in the Veterans Health Administration's MOVE! Weight management program
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a substantial problem in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). VHA developed and disseminated the MOVE! Weight Management Program for Veterans to its medical facilities but implementation of the program has been variable.
Purpose: The objective was to explore variation in MOVE! program implementation to identify facility structure, policies, and processes associated with larger patient weight-loss outcomes.
Methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was used to identify facility conditions or combinations of conditions associated with larger 6-month patient weight-loss outcomes. QCA is a method that allows for systematic cross-case comparison to better understand causal complexity. Eleven sites with larger outcomes and 11 sites with smaller outcomes were identified and data were collected with site interviews, facility-completed program summary forms, and medical record abstraction in 2009 and 2010. Conditions were selected based on theory and experience implementing MOVE! and were calibrated using QCA methods. Configuration patterns were examined to identify necessary conditions (i.e., always present when outcome present, but alone do not guarantee outcome) and sufficient conditions (i.e., presence guarantees outcome) at sites with larger and smaller outcomes. A thematic analysis of site interview data supplemented QCA findings.
Results: No two sites shared the same condition pattern. Necessary conditions included the use of a standard curriculum and group care-delivery format, and they were present at all sites with larger outcomes but at only six sites with smaller outcomes. At the 17 sites with both necessary conditions, four combinations of conditions were identified that accounted for all sites with larger outcomes. These included high program complexity combined with high staff involvement; group care-delivery format combined with low accountability to facility leadership; an active physician champion combined with low accountability to facility leadership; and the use of quality-improvement strategies combined with not using a waiting list.
Conclusions: The use of a standard curriculum delivered with a group care-delivery format is an essential feature of successful VHA facility MOVE! Weight Management Programs, but alone does not guarantee success. Program development and policy will be used to ensure dissemination of the best practices identified in this evaluation.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Assessing the scale-up of a weight loss program narrowing the gap between research and practice.Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):548-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.002. Am J Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 22011429 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53. Radiol Manage. 2003. PMID: 12800564
-
Barriers and facilitators to providing primary care-based weight management services in a patient centered medical home for Veterans: a qualitative study.BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Nov 14;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0383-x. BMC Fam Pract. 2015. PMID: 26572125 Free PMC article.
-
The role of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in patient care, surgical education, research and faculty development.Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):662-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.001. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16226937 Review.
-
Examining the Dose-Response Relationship in the Veterans Health Administration's MOVE!® Weight Management Program: A Nationwide Observational Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(Suppl 1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3992-3. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28271425 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical quality programs in the Veterans Health Administration.Am Surg. 2006 Nov;72(11):999-1004; discussion 1021-30, 1133-48. Am Surg. 2006. PMID: 17120940 Review.
Cited by
-
Weighing your options-intragastric balloon versus semaglutide.Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6070-6075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11169-z. Epub 2024 Aug 13. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39138683
-
Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system.Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2:e14344. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14344. Epub 2024 Jul 25. Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39054798 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-world impacts from a decade of Quality Enhancement Research Initiative-partnered projects to translate the Diabetes Prevention Program in the Veterans Health Administration.Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2:e14349. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14349. Epub 2024 Jul 5. Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38967218
-
The Impact of Blast Exposure-With or Without Traumatic Brain Injury-on Metabolic Abnormalities in Post-9/11 Veterans.J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023 Sep-Oct 01;38(5):380-390. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000874. Epub 2023 Mar 23. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 36951458 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative comparative analysis of the implementation fidelity of a workplace sedentary reduction intervention.BMC Public Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):1086. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13476-3. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35641923 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
