Objective: To review the information on fetal and perinatal autopsies, the process of obtaining consent, and the alternative information-gathering options following a prenatal diagnosis of non-chromosomal malformations, and to assist clinicians in providing postnatal counselling regarding fetal diagnosis and recurrence risks.
Outcomes: To provide better counselling about fetal and perinatal autopsies for women and families who are dealing with a prenatally diagnosed non-chromosomal fetal anomaly.
Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2009 and 2010, using appropriate key words (fetal autopsy, postmortem, autopsy, perinatal postmortem examination, autopsy protocol, postmortem magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy consent, tissue retention, autopsy evaluation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.
Benefits, harms, and costs: This update educates readers about (1) the benefits of a fetal perinatal autopsy, (2) the consent process, and (3) the alternatives when the family declines autopsy. It also provides a standardized approach to fetal and perinatal autopsies, emphasizing pertinent additional sampling when indicated.
Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). Recommendations 1. Standard autopsy should ideally be an essential part of fully investigating fetal loss, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths associated with non-chromosomal fetal malformations. (II-3A) 2. Clinicians and health care providers approaching parents for autopsy consent should discuss the options for a full, limited, or step-wise postmortem examination; the issue of retained fetal tissues; and the value of autopsy and the possibility that the information gained may not benefit them but may be of benefit to others. This information should be provided while respecting the personal and cultural values of the families. (III-A) 3. If parents are unwilling to give consent for a full autopsy, alternatives to full autopsy that provide additional clinical information must be presented in a manner that includes disclosure of limitations. (III-A) 4. External physical examination, medical photographs, and standard radiographic or computed tomography should be offered in all cases of fetal anomaly(ies) of non-chromosomal etiology. (II-2A) 5. Well-designed, large prospective studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging. It cannot function as a substitute for standard full autopsy. (III-A) 6. The fetal and perinatal autopsies should be performed by trained perinatal or pediatric pathologists. (II-2A) 7. The need for additional sampling is guided by the results of previous prenatal and/or genetic investigations, as well as the type of anomalies identified in the fetus. Fibroblast cultures may allow future laboratory studies, particularly in the absence of previous karyotyping or if a biochemical disorder is suspected, and DNA analysis. (II-3A) 8. In cases requiring special evaluation, the most responsible health care provider should have direct communication with the fetopathologist to ensure that all necessary sampling is performed in a timely manner. (II-3A) 9. The most responsible health care providers must see the families in follow-up to share autopsy findings, plan for the management of future pregnancies, obtain consent for additional testing, and offer genetic counselling to other family members when appropriate. (III-A).