Use of ureteroscopy before and after expansion of lithotripter ownership in Michigan
- PMID: 22014967
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.070
Use of ureteroscopy before and after expansion of lithotripter ownership in Michigan
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether ureteroscopy (URS) rates decreased following the expansion of lithotripter ownership in Michigan. Historically, Michigan has had limited urologist investment in lithotripters owing to strict Certificate of Need legislation. However, 2 of the nation's largest lithotripsy providers formed Michigan subsidiaries in 2005 and 2006, thereby altering the ownership landscape. Urologists who acquired partnership shares were incentivized to perform shock wave lithotripsy preferentially over URS. Because of ownership expansion, the rates of URS might have decreased.
Methods: From the Michigan files of the State Ambulatory Surgery Database, we abstracted the discharges for URS performed at hospital-based outpatient departments. We measured the differences between the patients who underwent URS in the year before (2004) and the year after (2007) ownership expansion. We then calculated the annual rates of URS in Michigan and evaluated for changes over time.
Results: A total of 5857 and 6294 URSs were performed in 2004 and 2007, respectively. Significant differences in age (P < .001), race (P < .001), primary payer (P < .001), and comorbidity status (P < .001) were observed between the patients who underwent URS before and after ownership expansion. However, the rates of URS in Michigan remained relatively flat despite the increased urologist ownership of lithotripters (P = .129 for the temporal trend).
Conclusion: The introduction of physician ownership of lithotripter units in Michigan was not associated with decreased rates of URS but might have influenced treatment selection among certain patient groups.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment.Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1291. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1420. Urology. 2011. PMID: 22137694 No abstract available.
-
Re: Tan H et al.: use of ureteroscopy before and after expansion of lithotriptor ownership in Michigan (Urology 2011;78:1287-1291).Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):742-3; author reply 743. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.057. Urology. 2012. PMID: 22925254 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Apr 10. Urology. 2009. PMID: 19362338
-
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):113-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590410028683. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006. PMID: 16608808
-
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15596177
-
Re: Tan H et al.: use of ureteroscopy before and after expansion of lithotriptor ownership in Michigan (Urology 2011;78:1287-1291).Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):742-3; author reply 743. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.057. Urology. 2012. PMID: 22925254 No abstract available.
-
Quantification of preoperative stone burden for ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy: current state and future recommendations.Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):282-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Feb 5. Urology. 2011. PMID: 21296390 Review.
Cited by
-
New Persistent Opioid Use After Outpatient Ureteroscopy for Upper Tract Stone Treatment.Urology. 2019 Dec;134:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Urology. 2019. PMID: 31536742 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
