Statement of problem: The replication of natural teeth, especially for single tooth restorations in patients with high esthetic needs, represents a challenge.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to analyze the color of the cervical portion of single metal ceramic crowns fabricated with different metal framework designs.
Material and methods: The color, as measured on the CIELAB color scale, of 3 different groups of restorations (n=10) fabricated with a high noble metal alloy (V-Deltaloy) and feldspathic porcelain (Noritake Super Porcelain) was analyzed with a colorimeter. Conventional metal ceramic crowns with metal facial margins were compared to metal ceramic crowns with porcelain facial margins and a horizontal reduction of the metal framework (1.0 mm reduction) or an additional vertical reduction (1.0 mm reduction). In all specimens, the finish line was positioned at a subgingival or equigingival level. The 6 groups obtained by the combination of the levels of the 2 factors (framework extension and finish line location) were examined with an ANOVA Fisher's F-test and a post hoc Tukey's HSD test (α=.05).
Results: The mean color difference for all the groups was clinically acceptable (ΔE<3.7). Conventional metal ceramic crowns showed higher differences in relation to finish line location (ΔE=2.34), while a vertical reduction of the framework was related to lower values (ΔE=0.96). Mean Lab* values were reported for all the groups of crowns. Statistically significant differences were present for L*, a*, and b* values when related to framework extension. Considering each value in relation to the interaction between framework extension and finish line location factors, significant differences were present only for L* and a* values.
Conclusions: No significant differences in base shade were present among the investigated crowns. Nevertheless metal ceramic crowns with vertical cut-back and porcelain facial margins presented more consistent results that tended to be closer to those of natural teeth.
Copyright © 2011 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.