Responding to surrogate requests that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will
- PMID: 22045374
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.08.003
Responding to surrogate requests that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will
Abstract
Clinicians may feel conflicted when a patient's legal decision maker is making decisions that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will. We provide evidence-based information to help clinicians consider whether a surrogate's inconsistent decisions are ethically appropriate. Surrogates are not flawless translators of their loved one's preferences; they are influenced by their own hopes and the current clinical context. Patients may be aware of this, are often concerned about burdening their loved ones, and often grant their surrogates leeway in interpreting their wishes. When appropriate, clinicians should respect surrogates' interpretations of patient values and take steps to decrease surrogate stress during the decision-making process. Finally, if clinicians are cognizant of their own values and preferences, they may recognize how these may affect their responses to certain clinical cases.
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34. J Clin Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23923811 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006. PMID: 17087695
-
Ethical issues in emergency care.Clin Geriatr Med. 1993 Aug;9(3):655-64. Clin Geriatr Med. 1993. PMID: 8374863 Review.
-
Advance directives and the concept of competence: are they a moral barrier to resuscitation?J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;58 Suppl 5(Pt 2):477-84. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 18204161
-
Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations.Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5 Suppl):S347-53. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065123.23736.12. Crit Care Med. 2003. PMID: 12771581 Review.
Cited by
-
NegotiAge: Development and pilot testing of an artificial intelligence-based family caregiver negotiation program.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Apr;72(4):1112-1121. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18775. Epub 2024 Jan 13. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024. PMID: 38217356
-
Advance Care Planning in Serious Illness: A Narrative Review.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):e63-e78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 24. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023. PMID: 36028176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Advance Care Compass- A New Mechanics for Digitally Transforming Advance Directives.Front Digit Health. 2021 Oct 15;3:753747. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.753747. eCollection 2021. Front Digit Health. 2021. PMID: 34723244 Free PMC article.
-
Difficulties Doctors Experience during Life-Sustaining Treatment Discussion after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):584-592. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.735. Epub 2020 Nov 19. Cancer Res Treat. 2021. PMID: 33211941 Free PMC article.
-
Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 27. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013. PMID: 23200188 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
