Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug;41(8):971-80.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1310-4. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve: intra-, inter-reader agreement, and agreement between two software packages

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve: intra-, inter-reader agreement, and agreement between two software packages

Roman Guggenberger et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To assess intra-, inter-reader agreement, and the agreement between two software packages for magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measurements of the median nerve.

Materials and methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers (seven men, eight women; mean age, 31.2 years) underwent DTI of both wrists at 1.5 T. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the median nerve were measured by three readers using two commonly used software packages. Measurements were repeated by two readers after 6 weeks. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.

Results: ICCs for intra-reader agreement ranged from 0.87 to 0.99, for inter-reader agreement from 0.62 to 0.83, and between the two software packages from 0.63 to 0.82. Bland-Altman analysis showed no differences for intra- and inter-reader agreement and agreement between software packages.

Conclusion: The intra-, inter-reader, and agreement between software packages for DTI measurements of the median nerve were moderate to substantial suggesting that user- and software-dependent factors contribute little to variance in DTI measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45(3):223-34 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Apr;13(4):534-46 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Feb;29(2):289-92 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45(3):169-84 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources