Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Feb;142(2):248-56; quiz e25-6.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.031. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas

David A Ahlquist et al. Gastroenterology. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background & aims: Technical advances have led to stool DNA (sDNA) tests that might accurately detect neoplasms on both sides of the colorectum. We assessed colorectal neoplasm detection by a next-generation sDNA test and effects of covariates on test performance.

Methods: We performed a blinded, multicenter, case-control study using archived stool samples collected in preservative buffer from 252 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), 133 with adenomas ≥ 1 cm, and 293 individuals with normal colonoscopy results (controls); two-thirds were randomly assigned to a training set and one-third to a test set. The sDNA test detects 4 methylated genes, a mutant form of KRAS, and the α-actin gene (as a reference value) using quantitative, allele-specific, real-time target and signal amplification; it also quantifies hemoglobin. We used a logistical model to analyze data.

Results: The sDNA test identified 85% of patients with CRC and 54% of patients with adenomas ≥1 cm with 90% specificity. The test had a high rate of detection for all nonmetastatic stages of CRC (aggregate 87% detection rate for CRC stages I-III). Detection rates increased with adenoma size: 54% ≥ 1 cm, 63% >1 cm, 77% >2 cm, 86% >3 cm, and 92% >4 cm (P < .0001). Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, the rate of CRC detection was slightly greater for the training than the test set (P = .04), whereas the rate of adenoma detection was comparable between sets. Sensitivities for detection of CRC and adenoma did not differ with lesion site.

Conclusions: Early-stage CRC and large adenomas can be detected throughout the colorectum and with high levels of accuracy by the sDNA test. Neoplasm size, but not anatomical site, affected detection rates. Further studies are needed to validate the findings in a larger population and optimize the sDNA test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

These authors disclose the following: Dr Ahlquist and Mr Taylor are inventors of licensed technology. Drs Ahlquist and Vogelstein are scientific advisors to Exact Sciences. Drs Zou, Domanico, Berger, and Lidgard are employees of Exact Sciences. Mayo Clinic has licensed intellectual property to and is a minor equity investor in Exact Sciences. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neoplasm detection by next-generation stool DNA test prototypes. ROC curves are shown for (A) training set and (B) test set. See Table 2 for definition of prototype test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Affect of neoplasm size on stool DNA test detection rates. (A) Adenomas. Detection rates increased directly with lesion size; P < .0001. (B) Colorectal cancer. Although all 8 cancers around 1 cm in size were detected, detection rates overall increased with lesion size; P = .008.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship of neoplasm size to quantitative stool DNA test scores: colorectal adenoma vs cancer. When stool DNA test scores were plotted against neoplasm size by piece-wise linear regression, curves for adenomas and cancers did not differ significantly; P = .40.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of neoplasm site on detection rates by stool DNA testing. Detection rates were comparable between proximal and distal colorectal cancers (P = NS) and between proximal and distal adenomas (P = NS).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Affect of colorectal cancer stage on detection rates by stool DNA testing. Detection rates did not differ significantly between stages I, II, or III. However, aggregate sensitivity of 87% for stages I–III was significantly higher than the sensitivity of 69% for stage IV; P = .02.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
    1. Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1688–1694. - PubMed
    1. Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, et al. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:422–428. - PubMed
    1. Ahlquist DA, Sargent DJ, Loprinzi CL, et al. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:441–450. W81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2704–2714. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms