Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas
- PMID: 22062357
- PMCID: PMC4017869
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.031
Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas
Abstract
Background & aims: Technical advances have led to stool DNA (sDNA) tests that might accurately detect neoplasms on both sides of the colorectum. We assessed colorectal neoplasm detection by a next-generation sDNA test and effects of covariates on test performance.
Methods: We performed a blinded, multicenter, case-control study using archived stool samples collected in preservative buffer from 252 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), 133 with adenomas ≥ 1 cm, and 293 individuals with normal colonoscopy results (controls); two-thirds were randomly assigned to a training set and one-third to a test set. The sDNA test detects 4 methylated genes, a mutant form of KRAS, and the α-actin gene (as a reference value) using quantitative, allele-specific, real-time target and signal amplification; it also quantifies hemoglobin. We used a logistical model to analyze data.
Results: The sDNA test identified 85% of patients with CRC and 54% of patients with adenomas ≥1 cm with 90% specificity. The test had a high rate of detection for all nonmetastatic stages of CRC (aggregate 87% detection rate for CRC stages I-III). Detection rates increased with adenoma size: 54% ≥ 1 cm, 63% >1 cm, 77% >2 cm, 86% >3 cm, and 92% >4 cm (P < .0001). Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, the rate of CRC detection was slightly greater for the training than the test set (P = .04), whereas the rate of adenoma detection was comparable between sets. Sensitivities for detection of CRC and adenoma did not differ with lesion site.
Conclusions: Early-stage CRC and large adenomas can be detected throughout the colorectum and with high levels of accuracy by the sDNA test. Neoplasm size, but not anatomical site, affected detection rates. Further studies are needed to validate the findings in a larger population and optimize the sDNA test.
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest
These authors disclose the following: Dr Ahlquist and Mr Taylor are inventors of licensed technology. Drs Ahlquist and Vogelstein are scientific advisors to Exact Sciences. Drs Zou, Domanico, Berger, and Lidgard are employees of Exact Sciences. Mayo Clinic has licensed intellectual property to and is a minor equity investor in Exact Sciences. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;114(12):1909-1918. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31764091 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical performance of an automated stool DNA assay for detection of colorectal neoplasia.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Apr 29. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23639600
-
Robust performance of a novel stool DNA test of methylated SDC2 for colorectal cancer detection: a multicenter clinical study.Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Oct 30;12(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00954-x. Clin Epigenetics. 2020. PMID: 33126908 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 21;21(35):10057-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10057. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26401070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors on Predictive Value of a Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Test.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 May-Jun 01;58(5):471-474. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001884. Epub 2023 Jun 27. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 37389965 Review.
Cited by
-
Discovery and validation of colorectal cancer tissue-specific methylation markers: a dual-center retrospective cohort study.Clin Epigenetics. 2024 Sep 7;16(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13148-024-01735-6. Clin Epigenetics. 2024. PMID: 39244604 Free PMC article.
-
DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Stool Samples: Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.Oncol Rev. 2024 Jul 23;18:1408529. doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1408529. eCollection 2024. Oncol Rev. 2024. PMID: 39108328 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing a Nomogram for Predicting Colorectal Cancer and Its Precancerous Lesions Based on Data from Three Non-Invasive Screening Tools, APCS, FIT, and sDNA.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jun 14;17:2891-2901. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S465286. eCollection 2024. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024. PMID: 38903878 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting colorectal cancer using genetic and epigenetic biomarkers: screening and diagnosis.J Med Life. 2024 Jan;17(1):4-14. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0269. J Med Life. 2024. PMID: 38737656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research progress and applications of epigenetic biomarkers in cancer.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1308309. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1308309. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38681199 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
-
- Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1688–1694. - PubMed
-
- Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, et al. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:422–428. - PubMed
-
- Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2704–2714. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
