Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a tissue-engineered bone with calcium-magnesium phosphate cement and bone marrow stromal cells in rabbits
- PMID: 22066969
- DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0379
Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a tissue-engineered bone with calcium-magnesium phosphate cement and bone marrow stromal cells in rabbits
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the effects of maxillary sinus floor elevation with a tissue-engineered bone constructed with bone marrow stromal cells (bMSCs) and calcium-magnesium phosphate cement (CMPC) material. The calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and phosphorus (P) ions released from calcium phosphate cement (CPC), magnesium phosphate cement (MPC), and CMPC were detected by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), and the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bMSCs seeded on CPC, MPC, and CMPC or cultured in CPC, MPC, and CMPC extracts were measured by MTT analysis, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay, alizarin red mineralization assay, and real-time PCR analysis of the osteogenic genes ALP and osteocalcin (OCN). Finally, bMSCs were combined with CPC, MPC, and CMPC and used for maxillary sinus floor elevation in rabbits, while CPC, MPC, or CMPC without cells served as control groups. The new bone formation in each group was detected by histological finding and fluorochrome labeling at weeks 2 and 8 after surgical operation. It was observed that the Ca ion concentrations of the CMPC and CPC scaffolds was significantly higher than that of the MPC scaffold, while the Mg ions concentration of CMPC and MPC was significantly higher than that of CPC. The bMSCs seeded on CMPC and MPC or cultured in their extracts proliferated more quickly than the cells seeded on CPC or cultured in its extract, respectively. The osteogenic differentiation of bMSCs seeded on CMPC and CPC or cultured in the corresponding extracts was significantly enhanced compared to that of bMSCs seeded on MPC or cultured in its extract; however, there was no significant difference between CMPC and CPC. As for maxillary sinus floor elevation in vivo, CMPC could promote more new bone formation and mineralization compared to CPC and MPC, while the addition of bMSCs could further enhance its new bone formation ability significantly. Our data suggest that CMPC possesses moderate biodegradability and excellent osteoconductivity, which may be attributed to its Ca and Mg ion composition, and the tissue-engineered bone constructed of CMPC and bMSCs might be a potential alterative graft for maxillofacial bone regeneration.
Similar articles
-
Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a tissue-engineered bone with rhBMP-2-loaded porous calcium phosphate cement scaffold and bone marrow stromal cells in rabbits.Cells Tissues Organs. 2011;194(6):481-93. doi: 10.1159/000323918. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Cells Tissues Organs. 2011. PMID: 21494013
-
Self-setting bioactive calcium-magnesium phosphate cement with high strength and degradability for bone regeneration.Acta Biomater. 2008 Nov;4(6):1873-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.06.020. Epub 2008 Jul 10. Acta Biomater. 2008. PMID: 18662897
-
Ectopic study of calcium phosphate cement seeded with pBMP-2 modified canine bMSCs mediated by a non-viral PEI derivative.Cell Biol Int. 2012 Feb;36(2):119-28. doi: 10.1042/CBI20100848. Cell Biol Int. 2012. PMID: 21899515
-
Calcium phosphate cement scaffold with stem cell co-culture and prevascularization for dental and craniofacial bone tissue engineering.Dent Mater. 2019 Jul;35(7):1031-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 7. Dent Mater. 2019. PMID: 31076156 Review.
-
Stem Cells and Calcium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.J Dent Res. 2014 Jul;93(7):618-25. doi: 10.1177/0022034514534689. Epub 2014 May 5. J Dent Res. 2014. PMID: 24799422 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
An Overview of Magnesium-Phosphate-Based Cements as Bone Repair Materials.J Funct Biomater. 2023 Aug 14;14(8):424. doi: 10.3390/jfb14080424. J Funct Biomater. 2023. PMID: 37623668 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring the potential of magnesium oxychloride, an amorphous magnesium phosphate, and newberyite as possible bone cement candidates.J Biomater Appl. 2023 Sep;38(3):438-454. doi: 10.1177/08853282231190908. Epub 2023 Aug 1. J Biomater Appl. 2023. PMID: 37525613 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of degradation behavior and osseointegration of 3D powder-printed calcium magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds with alkaline or acid post-treatment.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 28;10:998254. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.998254. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36246367 Free PMC article.
-
Extrusion-Based 3D Printing of Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Cement Pastes for Degradable Bone Implants.Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 10;14(18):5197. doi: 10.3390/ma14185197. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34576421 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing the mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of magnesium potassium phosphate cement by incorporating oxygen-carboxymethyl chitosan.Regen Biomater. 2020 Dec 3;8(1):rbaa048. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaa048. eCollection 2021 Feb 1. Regen Biomater. 2020. PMID: 33732494 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
