Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;23(1):179-85.
doi: 10.1007/s13361-011-0265-y. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

Identification of "Known Unknowns" Utilizing Accurate Mass Data and ChemSpider

Affiliations

Identification of "Known Unknowns" Utilizing Accurate Mass Data and ChemSpider

James L Little et al. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. .

Abstract

In many cases, an unknown to an investigator is actually known in the chemical literature, a reference database, or an internet resource. We refer to these types of compounds as "known unknowns." ChemSpider is a very valuable internet database of known compounds useful in the identification of these types of compounds in commercial, environmental, forensic, and natural product samples. The database contains over 26 million entries from hundreds of data sources and is provided as a free resource to the community. Accurate mass mass spectrometry data is used to query the database by either elemental composition or a monoisotopic mass. Searching by elemental composition is the preferred approach. However, it is often difficult to determine a unique elemental composition for compounds with molecular weights greater than 600 Da. In these cases, searching by the monoisotopic mass is advantageous. In either case, the search results are refined by sorting the number of references associated with each compound in descending order. This raises the most useful candidates to the top of the list for further evaluation. These approaches were shown to be successful in identifying "known unknowns" noted in our laboratory and for compounds of interest to others.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 31 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Chromatogr A. 2009 Jan 16;1216(3):510-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2004 Apr;15(4):626 - PubMed
    1. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(15):2538-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2011 Feb;22(2):348-59 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009 Nov;20(11):2058-69 - PubMed
Feedback