Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis
- PMID: 22077106
- DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.640667
Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis
Abstract
Objective: Bilastine is a non-sedating second-generation H(1) antihistamine with proven efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of bilastine in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with symptomatic PAR (n = 650) from Argentina, Europe, and South Africa received bilastine 20 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, or placebo once daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean area under the curve (AUC) of reflective total 6-symptom scores (rT6SS) from baseline visit to day 28 (D28). Secondary outcome measures included mean AUC of instantaneous total 6-symptom scores (iT6SS), and mean AUCs of reflective and instantaneous total 4-nasal symptom scores (T4NSS) and total 2-ocular symptom scores (T2OSS) from baseline to D28. An open-label extension phase evaluated the safety of bilastine 20 mg administered to patients (n = 513) for one year.
Results: In the overall population no significant differences in efficacy outcomes were found between active treatments and placebo. On account of the high placebo response in South Africa, a post-hoc analysis was conducted. This analysis demonstrated that statistically significant differences existed between active treatments and placebo in the mean AUC of rT6SS (p < 0.05) and T4NSS (p < 0.02), respectively, from baseline to D28 visit for the intent-to-treat population in patients from Europe and Argentina, whereas the difference was not statistically significant in South Africa. Whether this is related to differences in the demographic or clinical characteristics of South African patients (they had PAR for longer and reported more severe symptoms) and/or the disease management process compared with their European and Argentinean counterparts warrants further investigation.
Conclusions: A post-hoc analysis indicated that bilastine and cetirizine were similarly effective and more effective than placebo during a 4-week treatment period in patients with PAR. In addition, bilastine was shown to be safe and well-tolerated over a 1-year treatment period.
Clinical trial registry number: NCT01127620.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Sep;39(9):1338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03257.x. Epub 2009 May 4. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009. PMID: 19438584 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.Allergy. 2009 Jan;64(1):158-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01813.x. Allergy. 2009. PMID: 19132976 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.Allergy. 2010 Apr;65(4):516-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02217.x. Epub 2009 Oct 23. Allergy. 2010. PMID: 19860762 Clinical Trial.
-
Levocetirizine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults and children.Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1664-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.015. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19808127 Review.
-
Bilastine: in allergic rhinitis and urticaria.Drugs. 2012 Jun 18;72(9):1257-69. doi: 10.2165/11209310-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22686617 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine on nasal itching in children with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 23;14:1240917. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1240917. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37680707 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Tolerability of Bilastine 0.6% Ophthalmic Solution: An 8-Weeks Phase III Study.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 4;17:735-746. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S398168. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36909350 Free PMC article.
-
Bilastine for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, urticaria.Aust Prescr. 2022 Oct;45(5):179. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2022.057. Epub 2022 Sep 1. Aust Prescr. 2022. PMID: 36382168 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Bojungikgi-Tang for Persistent Allergic Rhinitis: A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 20;2022:4414192. doi: 10.1155/2022/4414192. eCollection 2022. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022. PMID: 35769160 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 10;12:731201. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.731201. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35082662 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
