Association between Leapfrog safe practices score and hospital mortality in major surgery
- PMID: 22082837
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318238f26b
Association between Leapfrog safe practices score and hospital mortality in major surgery
Abstract
Background: The Leapfrog Group reports on hospitals' adoption of the National Quality Forum Patient Safety Practices. However, it is unknown whether hospital compliance with these safe practices is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery.
Methods: We analyzed the association between hospital mortality and Leapfrog Safe Practices among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=18,565), abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n=2777), and hip replacement (n=25,067) in hospitals participating in the 2007 Leapfrog Hospital Survey using logistic regression.
Results: After adjusting for patient and hospital factors, we found that the total safety score (adjusted odds ratio: 1.000, 95% confidence interval: 0.999-1.001) was not associated with hospital mortality. Computerized physician order entry and ICU physician staffing were also not associated with hospital mortality.
Conclusions: We did not find evidence that patients undergoing major surgery at hospitals which scored higher on the Leapfrog Safe Practices Survey had lower mortality rates. The Leapfrog safe practices score as a standalone quality measure may have limited power to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality hospitals.
Similar articles
-
Improving surgical outcomes through adoption of evidence-based process measures: intervention specific or associated with overall hospital quality?Surgery. 2010 Apr;147(4):481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.037. Epub 2009 Dec 11. Surgery. 2010. PMID: 20004443
-
Limitations of hospital volume as a measure of quality of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.017. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 16305854
-
Adoption of national quality forum safe practices by Magnet® hospitals.J Nurs Adm. 2011 Sep;41(9):350-6. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822a71a7. J Nurs Adm. 2011. PMID: 21881440
-
Contemporary performance of U.S. teaching and nonteaching hospitals.Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):701-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253676a. Acad Med. 2012. PMID: 22534588
-
Shaping the future of surgery: the role of private regulation in determining quality standards.Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):304-12. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000200854.34298.e3. Ann Surg. 2006. PMID: 16495692 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Quality of Care Among Medicare Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery: Safety Grade, Magnet Recognition, and Leapfrog Minimum Volume Standards-Which Quality Benchmark Matters?J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):269-277. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04504-6. Epub 2020 Feb 10. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021. PMID: 32040811
-
Health Care Policy and Outcomes after Colon and Rectal Surgery: What Is the Bigger Picture?-Cost Containment, Incentivizing Value, Transparency, and Centers of Excellence.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 May;32(3):212-220. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677028. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019. PMID: 31061652 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dissecting Leapfrog: How Well Do Leapfrog Safe Practices Scores Correlate With Hospital Compare Ratings and Penalties, and How Much Do They Matter?Med Care. 2017 Jun;55(6):606-614. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000716. Med Care. 2017. PMID: 28288072 Free PMC article.
-
Specialization and utilization after hepatectomy in academic medical centers.J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.072. Epub 2013 May 21. J Surg Res. 2013. PMID: 23746763 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
