Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios: a randomized trial
- PMID: 22084331
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00003
Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend that patients receiving warfarin undergo international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring every 4 weeks.
Objective: To investigate whether assessment of warfarin dosing every 12 weeks is as safe as assessment every 4 weeks.
Design: Noninferiority randomized trial. The randomization schedule (in a 1:1 ratio) was computer-generated, and allocation was concealed until the database was locked by using a centralized schedule. Patients, study and clinical personnel, adjudicators of clinical events, and the study statistician were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00356759) SETTING: Single center in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Patients: 250 patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy, whose dose was unchanged for at least 6 months; 226 completed the study.
Intervention: Dosing assessment every 12 weeks (n = 124) compared with every 4 weeks (n = 126) for 12 months. Patients in the 12-week group were tested every 4 weeks; sham INRs within the target range were reported for two of the three 4-week periods.
Measurements: Percentage of time in the therapeutic range (primary outcome) and number of extreme INRs, changes in maintenance dose, major bleeding events, objectively verified thromboembolism, and death (secondary outcomes).
Results: The percentage of time in the therapeutic range was 74.1% (SD, 18.8%) in the 4-week group compared with 71.6% (SD, 20.0%) in the 12-week group (absolute difference, 2.5 percentage points [1-sided 97.5% upper confidence bound, 7.3 percentage points]; noninferiority P = 0.020 for a 7.5-percentage point margin). Fewer patients in the 12-week group than in the 4-week group had any dose changes (37.1% vs. 55.6%; absolute difference, 18.5 percentage points [95% CI, 6.1 to 30.0 percentage points]; P = 0.004). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups.
Limitations: Patients in the 12-week group had testing and contact with clinic staff every 4 weeks. The study was conducted at a single center and used surrogate outcomes.
Conclusion: Assessment of warfarin dosing every 12 weeks seems to be safe and noninferior to assessment every 4 weeks. A comparison of INR testing, patient contact, and warfarin dose assessment every 12 weeks versus every 4 weeks is necessary before INR testing every 12 weeks can be routinely recommended for practice.
Primary funding source: Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation.
Comment in
-
Learning the respective roles of warfarin and dabigatran to prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):714-5, W218. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22084336 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Less-frequent warfarin dose assessment was noninferior for patients with stable INRs.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):JC3-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-02003. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22431689 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients: can people who are receiving steady doses of warfarin have their dose assessed less frequently?Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):I34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22084347 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Single-dose adjustment versus no adjustment of warfarin in stably anticoagulated patients with an occasional international normalized ratio (INR) out of range.Thromb Res. 2010 May;125(5):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 29. Thromb Res. 2010. PMID: 19640572 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of warfarin management with international normalized ratio self-testing and online remote monitoring and management plus low-dose vitamin k with genomic considerations: a pilot study.Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Nov;33(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1002/phar.1343. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Pharmacotherapy. 2013. PMID: 24038412
-
The effect of acetaminophen on the international normalized ratio in patients stabilized on warfarin therapy.Pharmacotherapy. 2007 May;27(5):675-83. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.5.675. Pharmacotherapy. 2007. PMID: 17461702 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of anticoagulation intensity and management of bleeding with old and new oral anticoagulants.Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jul;29(7 Suppl):S34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.04.013. Can J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23790596 Review.
-
Anticoagulation: monitoring of patients receiving anticoagulation.FP Essent. 2014 Jul;422:24-30. FP Essent. 2014. PMID: 25033003 Review.
Cited by
-
Rosendaal linear interpolation method appraising of time in therapeutic range in patients with 12-week follow-up interval after mechanical heart valve replacement.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 9;9:925571. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.925571. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36158842 Free PMC article.
-
Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and oral anticoagulants: Drug-drug interaction and clinical events in a retrospective cohort.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Feb 17;6(2):e12650. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12650. eCollection 2022 Feb. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022. PMID: 35224414 Free PMC article.
-
Changes within an anticoagulation clinic during COVID-19.Can Pharm J (Ott). 2021 Oct 4;154(6):381-384. doi: 10.1177/17151635211047528. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2021. PMID: 34777647 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Is the use of warfarin becoming obsolete?J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 May 10;11(3):418-419. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1918474. eCollection 2021. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021. PMID: 34234920 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Drive-up INR testing and phone-based consultations service during COVID-19 pandemic in a pharmacist-lead anticoagulation clinic in Qatar: Monitoring, clinical, resource utilization, and patient- oriented outcomes.J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2021 Sep;4(9):1117-1125. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1469. Epub 2021 May 20. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2021. PMID: 34226887 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical