Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):745-51.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100255.

Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety

John W Beasley  1 , Tosha B Wetterneck, Jon Temte, Jamie A Lapin, Paul Smith, A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez, Ben-Tzion Karsh
Affiliations

Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety

John W Beasley et al. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explore the concept of information chaos as it applies to the issues of patient safety and physician workload in primary care and to propose a research agenda.

Methods: We use a human factors engineering perspective to discuss the concept of information chaos in primary care and explore implications for its impact on physician performance and patient safety.

Results: Information chaos is comprised of various combinations of information overload, information underload, information scatter, information conflict, and erroneous information. We provide a framework for understanding information chaos, its impact on physician mental workload and situation awareness, and its consequences, and we discuss possible solutions and suggest a research agenda that may lead to methods to reduce the problem.

Conclusions: Information chaos is experienced routinely by primary care physicians. This is not just inconvenient, annoying, and frustrating; it has implications for physician performance and patient safety. Additional research is needed to define methods to measure and eventually reduce information chaos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical Vignette Illustrating Information Hazards
Figure 2
Figure 2
Information Chaos, Mental Workload, Situational Awareness, Moderators and Impacts
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Guest family physician commentaries.
    Selinger HA. Selinger HA. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):628-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110272. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011. PMID: 22086801 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Donaldson M, Yordy K, Lohr K. Primary Care America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1996. - PubMed
    1. Starfield B. Primary Care. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 1993;16(4):27–37. - PubMed
    1. Elder NC, Graham D, Brandt E, et al. The Testing Process in Family Medicine: Problems, Solutions and Barriers as Seen by Physicians and Their Staff: A Study of the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Research Network. Journal of Patient Safety. 2006;2(1):25–32.
    1. Kuzel AJ, Woolf SH, Gilchrist VJ, et al. Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;2(4):333–340. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips RL, Dovey SM, Graham D, Elder NC, Hickner J. Learning From Different Lenses: Reports of Medical Errors in Primary Care by Clinicians, Staff, and Patients: A Project of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Journal of Patient Safety. 2006;2(1):140–146.

Publication types