Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):486-508.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01332.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

Physician practices and readiness for medical home reforms: policy, pitfalls, and possibilities

Affiliations

Physician practices and readiness for medical home reforms: policy, pitfalls, and possibilities

John M Hollingsworth et al. Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the proportion of physician practices in the United States that currently meets medical home criteria.

Data source/study setting: 2007 and 2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Study design: We mapped survey items to the National Committee on Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) medical home standards. After awarding points for each "passed" element, we calculated a practice's infrastructure score, dividing its cumulative total by the number of available points. We identified practices that would be recognized as a medical home (Level 1 [25-49 percent], Level 2 [50-74 percent], or Level 3 [infrastructure score ≥75 percent]) and examined characteristics associated with NCQA recognition.

Results: Forty-six percent (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 42.5-50.2) of all practices lack sufficient medical home infrastructure. While 72.3 percent (95 percent CI, 64.0-80.7 percent) of multi-specialty groups would achieve recognition, only 49.8 percent (95 percent CI, 45.2-54.5 percent) of solo/partnership practices meet NCQA standards. Although better prepared than specialists, 40 percent of primary care practices would not qualify as a medical home under present criteria.

Conclusion: Almost half of all practices fail to meet NCQA standards for medical home recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of Patient Visits to “Not Recognized” Primary Care Practices by Race/Ethnicity and Poverty Strata

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berenson RA. “Is There Room for Specialists in the Patient-Centered Medical Home?”. Chest. 2010;137(1):10–1. - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K, Berenson RA. “A Lifeline for Primary Care”. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(26):2693–9. - PubMed
    1. Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Burns C, Oliver D, Thapar A, Mead N, Safran DG, Roland MO. “Identifying Predictors of High Quality Care in English General Practice: Observational Study”. British Medical Journal. 2001;323(7316):784–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrier E, Gourevitch MN, Shah NR. “Medical Homes: Challenges in Translating Theory into Practice”. Medical Care. 2009;47(7):714–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casalino LP, Rittenhouse DR, Gillies RR, Shortell SM. “Specialist Physician Practices as Patient-Centered Medical Homes”. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362(17):1555–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources