Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):984-1007.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01340.x. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

The sensitivity of adverse event cost estimates to diagnostic coding error

Affiliations

The sensitivity of adverse event cost estimates to diagnostic coding error

Gavin Wardle et al. Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of diagnostic coding error on estimates of hospital costs attributable to adverse events.

Data sources: Original and reabstracted medical records of 9,670 complex medical and surgical admissions at 11 hospital corporations in Ontario from 2002 to 2004. Patient specific costs, not including physician payments, were retrieved from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative database.

Study design: Adverse events were identified among the original and reabstracted records using ICD10-CA (Canadian adaptation of ICD10) codes flagged as postadmission complications. Propensity score matching and multivariate regression analysis were used to estimate the cost of the adverse events and to determine the sensitivity of cost estimates to diagnostic coding error.

Principal findings: Estimates of the cost of the adverse events ranged from $16,008 (metabolic derangement) to $30,176 (upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Coding errors caused the total cost attributable to the adverse events to be underestimated by 16 percent. The impact of coding error on adverse event cost estimates was highly variable at the organizational level.

Conclusions: Estimates of adverse event costs are highly sensitive to coding error. Adverse event costs may be significantly underestimated if the likelihood of error is ignored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Medical Association. ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting. 2008. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/cpt/icd9cm_coding_guidelines_08_09....
    1. Bates D, Spell N, Cullen D, Burdick E, Laird N, Petersen L, Small S, Sweitzer B, Leape LL, Name F, Bates DW, Spell C, Burdick L, Petersen S, Sweitzer L. The Costs of Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997;277:307–11. - PubMed
    1. Best W, Khuri S, Phelan M, Hur K, Henderson W, Demakis J, Daley J. Identifying Patient Preoperative Risk Factors and Postoperative Adverse Events in Administrative Databases: Results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2002;194:257–66. - PubMed
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1987;40:373–84. - PubMed
    1. CIHI. Canadian Coding Standards for ICD-10-CA and CCI for 2006. Ottawa, Canada: The Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources