Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;19(4):692-702.
doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.144. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

RP58/ZNF238 directly modulates proneurogenic gene levels and is required for neuronal differentiation and brain expansion

Affiliations

RP58/ZNF238 directly modulates proneurogenic gene levels and is required for neuronal differentiation and brain expansion

C Xiang et al. Cell Death Differ. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Although neurogenic pathways have been described in the developing neocortex, less is known about mechanisms ensuring correct neuronal differentiation thus also preventing tumor growth. We have shown that RP58 (aka zfp238 or znf238) is highly expressed in differentiating neurons, that its expression is lost or diminished in brain tumors, and that its reintroduction blocks their proliferation. Mice with loss of RP58 die at birth with neocortical defects. Using a novel conditional RP58 allele here we show that its CNS-specific loss yields a novel postnatal phenotype: microencephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum and cerebellar hypoplasia that resembles the chr1qter deletion microcephaly syndrome in human. RP58 mutant brains maintain precursor pools but have reduced neuronal and increased glial differentiation. Well-timed downregulation of pax6, ngn2 and neuroD1 depends on RP58 mediated transcriptional repression, ngn2 and neuroD1 being direct targets. Thus, RP58 may act to favor neuronal differentiation and brain growth by coherently repressing multiple proneurogenic genes in a timely manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Loss of RP58 produces a novel postnatal microencephalic phenotype with a thin neocortex and absence of corpus callosum. (ad) Dorsal views at the same magnification of control (a and c) and RP58 cKO (b and d) brains at postnatal (P) day 8 and 15. Note the reduced size of the cerebral (ctx) and cerebellar (cb) cortices in mutant brains. The black arrows indicate the cerebellar vermis, which is lost in RP58 mutants. (ej) Histological analyses of control (e, g and i) and RP58 mutant (f, h and j) cortices at E15.5 and P2 after Nissl staining, seen in a coronal section (e and f) and sagittal sections (gj) near the midline. Mutant cortices lack a midline-crossing corpus callosum (Cc, arrows in panel e) and have a thin cerebral cortex as compared with the controls (gj). Scale bars=0.5 cm: panels ad; 100 μm: panels e and f; 200 μm: panels g and h; 500 μm: panels i and j
Figure 2
Figure 2
Loss of RP58 impairs normal neurogenesis. (a) Top: Sagittal sections of E18.5 cortices were stained with Nissl (top row) or subjected to in situ hybridization for the probes indicated on the left. Note the decrease of markers expressed in layer V, IV and II–IV in the RP58 cKO (compare with Supplementary Figure 4 for the RP58 KO). The asterisks show ectopic ER81 expression in the VZ and residual faint cux2 expression in the cortical upper layers. Scale bar=100 μm. Bottom: Sagittal sections of control and RP58 cKO E18.5 cortices showing altered localization of CTIP2+ cells and strong reduction of SATB2+ cells in the mutant cortices. Nuclei are labeled with the Hoechst dye. Scale bar=200 μm. (b) Top: Analyses of neuronal-specific MAP2 labeling in control and RP58 mutant cortices at E14.5. Note loss of neurons in the mutant cortices. Scale bar=100 μm. Bottom: Sagittal sections of control and RP58 cKO P8 cortices showing reduction in thickness and loss of NeuN-expressing neurons in the mutant brain. Scale bar=200 μm. (c) Analyses of the density and morphology of Nestin+ and GFAP+ labeled cells by confocal microscopy in P2 control and RP58 mutant cortices focusing on the subventricular zone (SVZ) and cortical plate (CP). Scale bar=30 μm. (d) Analysis of the number of MAP2+ cells in E14.5 acutely dissociated cortices. After dissociation, cells were plated 2 h before fixation and immunostaining. The number of MAP2+ cells at E14.5 is reduced in the RP58 mutant cerebral cortex when compared with the control cortex. The experiment was performed on three independent litters. The asterisk denotes significant change (P<0.01). (e) Western blot analysis of the levels of cell type-specific markers in P0 control and RP58 mutant cortices. RP58 expression is lost in the mutants, which have increased Nestin and GFAP levels, and decreased MAP2 levels. Tubulin is shown as a loading control. (f) Quantification of the expression levels of multiple markers of radial glial cells (glast, blbp) and of intermediate neurogenic progenitors (INPs) (svet1, math2, satb2, cux2 and tbr2) in cortical cells at E14.5. Analyses were performed by quantitative RT-PCR and values were normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene gapdh. (g) Localization of the changes in the expression of RP58 (top row) and tbr2 (bottom row) mRNAs in E14.5 control and mutant cortices by in situ hybridization. Note that tbr2 is expressed in cells in the VZ (asterisk) as well as in the SVZ (arrow). Scale bar=100 μm
Figure 3
Figure 3
Loss of RP58 leads to increased glial differentiation. (a) The origin of the astrocytes in the cortical VZ/SVZ was determined in BrdU birth-dating experiments: dividing cells were labeled with a BrdU pulse at E16.5 and examined for BrdU and GFAP expression at P2. BrdU+/GFAP+ cell counting was performed on sections from three different brains for each genotype and indicated that more astrocytes were produced at E16.5 in the RP58 mutant mice as compared with the control cortex. The asterisk denotes significant change (P<0.05). Scale bar=20 μm. (b) E14.5 cerebral cortices were dissociated and grown as primary spheres at clonal density. Primary spheres were then dissociated and differentiated for 3–4 days. The number of neurons (Tuj1+ cells) and astrocytes (GFAP+ cells) was counted for each differentiation assay. Three independent experiments (three different litters) were analyzed. Neuronal differentiation is highly reduced in the RP58 mutant in favor of glial differentiation. The asterisk denotes significant change (P<0.05). Scale bar=100 μm
Figure 4
Figure 4
Deregulation of progenitor pools was revealed by cell sorting in RP58 mutant cortices. (a) FACS graph showing separation of E14.5 cortical cells depending on their expression of CD133 (Prominin1) and EGFP, the latter driven from the tbr2 regulatory region in tbr2: EGFP mice. The subpopulations of cells include the following: Group-A: CD133+/EGFP-containing RGCs in the VZ; Group-B: double positives, containing INPs in the SVZ; and Group-C: CD133/EGFP+, containing differentiating/differentiated cortical neurons. (b) Characterization of the three cell populations described in panel a by expression of key molecular markers of RGCs (blbp, glast, pax6), INPs (tbr2) and neurons (tbr1, MAP2). (c) Quantification of the pool size of A and B cells in control and RP58 KO cortices. A small increase in A cells and a slight decrease in B cells were observed in the mutant cortices at E14.5. The asterisks denote significant changes (P<0.05 for A cells, P<0.01 for B cells). (d) Loss of RP58 leads to an increased number of neocortical neurospheres. E14.5 cerebral cortices were dissociated and grown as primary spheres at clonal density (less than 10 cells/μl). After 7 days, primary spheres were dissociated and challenged to form secondary spheres also at clonal density. The number of primary and secondary neurospheres was assessed visually in triplicate assays for each experiment. Three independent experiments with three different litters were analyzed. A two-tailed t-test was applied for statistical analysis. The asterisks denote significant changes (P<0.001)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Loss of RP58 leads to deregulation of proneurogenic gene expression. Analyses of the expression levels of RP58, and key RGC and INP regulators in sorted cell populations in control and RP58 mutant cortices at E14.5. Note (1) loss of RP58 expression in the mutant and (2) the consistent increase of pax6, ngn2 and neuroD1 in C cells. The diagrams are from a representative experiment. Experiments were performed in triplicates from three independent litters, with similar results
Figure 6
Figure 6
RP58 directly regulates ngn2 and neuroD1 expression. (a) A schematic diagram showing the localization of two putative RP58-binding sites and the primers (arrrows) used in the ChIP–PCR in panels b and c. The ngn2 gene is indicated in green. The putative RP58-binding sites (BS1 and BS2) in the 5′ ngn2 genomic region are indicated by red boxes. (b) ChIP analyses of RP58 recruitment and presence of trimethylated histone H3K27 (H3K27me3) as a marker of repressed loci in control and RP58 mutant cortices using primers specific to the ngn2 genomic region encompassing the RP58-binding site BS2 at chr3:127336163+127336391 (see scheme in panel a). Note that the histograms show the fold enrichment of WT/KO. (c) Specific and preferential binding of RP58 to the ngn2 genomic region in the differentiated C cell populations. This experiment was performed on cells sorted from two independent litters, with primers encompassing the same binding site BS2, with similar results. Note that the background thresholds obtained with a ChIP experiment using an isotyped IgG are set at 1 (black bars). (d) Top: A schematic diagram showing the ngn2-luciferase construct (ngn2-luc plasmid: ngn2 regulatory region containing two RP58-binding sites) used for the data presented in panels e and f. Bottom: Sequences of the two RP58-binding sites, BS1 and BS2, in the ngn2 promoter region. Mutant versions of BS1 and BS2, and their sequence orientations are noted. (e) Transcriptional repression of an ngn2 regulatory region driving the expression of firefly luciferase by RP58. HEK293T cells were transfected with the ngn2-luc plasmid (see panel a). Ngn2-luc was transfected alone or with increasing doses of an RP58-expressing plasmid. Luciferase activity was assayed 48 h after transfection. Shown is a representative experiment of three independent biological replicates with similar results. The asterisks denote significant changes (P<0.001). (f) Mutation of RP58-binding sites impairs its repression of the ngn2 promoter. The ngn2-luc constructs containing no (WT), 1 or 2 mutant (MUT) RP58-binding sites were co-transfected into HEK293T cells together with an RP58-expressing plasmid. Luciferase activity was normalized as percentage of the same reporter activity in the absence of exogenous RP58. Shown is a representative experiment of three independent biological replicates with similar results. A statistically significant difference of activity was observed between BS1-MUT and BS2-MUT (P<0.01), as well as between the single mutant BS1-MUT and the double mutant BS1-MUT+BS2-MUT (P<0.01). (g) A schematic diagram showing the localization of the primers (arrows) used in the ChIP–PCR in panels h and i. The neuroD1 gene is indicated in yellow. The unique consensus RP58-binding site (BS) in the proximal 5′ neuroD1 genomic region is indicated by a red box. (h) ChIP analyses of RP58 recruitment and presence of trimethylated histone H3K27 (H3K27me3) as a marker of repressed loci in control and RP58 mutant cortices using primers specific to the neuroD1 genomic region encompassing the RP58-binding site. Note that the histograms show the fold enrichment of WT/KO. (i) Specific and preferential binding of RP58 to the neuroD1 genomic region in cells of the progenitor B cell population. Note that the background thresholds obtained with a ChIP experiment using an isotyped IgG are set at 1 (black bars). (j) Top: A schematic diagram showing the neuroD1-luciferase construct used for the data presented in panels k and l. Bottom: Sequence of the RP58-binding site BS in the neuroD1 promoter region. The mutant version of BS and sequence orientation is noted. (k) Transcriptional repression by RP58 of a neuroD1 regulatory region driving the expression of firefly luciferase. HEK293T cells were transfected with the neuroD1-luc plasmid (neuroD1 regulatory region containing one RP58-binding site driving a luciferase reporter gene). NeuroD1-luc was transfected alone or with increasing doses of an RP58-expressing plasmid. Shown is a representative experiment of three independent biological replicates with similar results. The asterisks denote significant changes (P<0.001). (l) Mutation of RP58-binding site impairs its repression of the neuroD1 promoter. The neuroD1-luc constructs containing the WT or mutant BS were co-transfected into HEK293T cells together with an RP58-expressing plasmid. Luciferase activity was normalized as percentage of the same reporter activity in the absence of exogenous RP58. Shown is a representative experiment of three independent biological replicates with similar results

Similar articles

Cited by

  • From trans to cis: transcriptional regulatory networks in neocortical development.
    Shibata M, Gulden FO, Sestan N. Shibata M, et al. Trends Genet. 2015 Feb;31(2):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 24. Trends Genet. 2015. PMID: 25624274 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Large-scale targeted sequencing identifies risk genes for neurodevelopmental disorders.
    Wang T, Hoekzema K, Vecchio D, Wu H, Sulovari A, Coe BP, Gillentine MA, Wilfert AB, Perez-Jurado LA, Kvarnung M, Sleyp Y, Earl RK, Rosenfeld JA, Geisheker MR, Han L, Du B, Barnett C, Thompson E, Shaw M, Carroll R, Friend K, Catford R, Palmer EE, Zou X, Ou J, Li H, Guo H, Gerdts J, Avola E, Calabrese G, Elia M, Greco D, Lindstrand A, Nordgren A, Anderlid BM, Vandeweyer G, Van Dijck A, Van der Aa N, McKenna B, Hancarova M, Bendova S, Havlovicova M, Malerba G, Bernardina BD, Muglia P, van Haeringen A, Hoffer MJV, Franke B, Cappuccio G, Delatycki M, Lockhart PJ, Manning MA, Liu P, Scheffer IE, Brunetti-Pierri N, Rommelse N, Amaral DG, Santen GWE, Trabetti E, Sedláček Z, Michaelson JJ, Pierce K, Courchesne E, Kooy RF; SPARK Consortium; Nordenskjöld M, Romano C, Peeters H, Bernier RA, Gecz J, Xia K, Eichler EE. Wang T, et al. Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 1;11(1):4932. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18723-y. Nat Commun. 2020. PMID: 33004838 Free PMC article.
  • Identification of ZBTB18 as a novel colorectal tumor suppressor gene through genome-wide promoter hypermethylation analysis.
    Bazzocco S, Dopeso H, Martínez-Barriocanal Á, Anguita E, Nieto R, Li J, García-Vidal E, Maggio V, Rodrigues P, de Marcondes PG, Schwartz S Jr, Aaltonen LA, Sánchez A, Mariadason JM, Arango D. Bazzocco S, et al. Clin Epigenetics. 2021 Apr 23;13(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01070-0. Clin Epigenetics. 2021. PMID: 33892786 Free PMC article.
  • Separating the wheat from the chaff: systematic identification of functionally relevant noncoding variants in ADHD.
    Tong JH, Hawi Z, Dark C, Cummins TD, Johnson BP, Newman DP, Lau R, Vance A, Heussler HS, Matthews N, Bellgrove MA, Pang KC. Tong JH, et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;21(11):1589-1598. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.2. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Mol Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27113999
  • The genetic basis of neurocranial size and shape across varied lab mouse populations.
    Percival CJ, Devine J, Hassan CR, Vidal-Garcia M, O'Connor-Coates CJ, Zaffarini E, Roseman C, Katz D, Hallgrimsson B. Percival CJ, et al. J Anat. 2022 Aug;241(2):211-229. doi: 10.1111/joa.13657. Epub 2022 Mar 31. J Anat. 2022. PMID: 35357006 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Ever L, Gaiano N. Radial ‘glial' progenitors: neurogenesis and signaling. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:29–33. - PubMed
    1. Kriegstein A, Noctor S, Martinez-Cerdeno V. Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nat Rev. 2006;7:883–890. - PubMed
    1. Pontious A, Kowalczyk T, Englund C, Hevner RF. Role of intermediate progenitor cells in cerebral cortex development. Dev Neurosci. 2008;30:24–32. - PubMed
    1. Kowalczyk T, Pontious A, Englund C, Daza RA, Bedogni F, Hodge R, et al. Intermediate neuronal progenitors (basal progenitors) produce pyramidal-projection neurons for all layers of cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2439–2450. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sessa A, Mao CA, Hadjantonakis AK, Klein WH, Broccoli V. Tbr2 directs conversion of radial glia into basal precursors and guides neuronal amplification by indirect neurogenesis in the developing neocortex. Neuron. 2008;60:56–69. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms