Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;42(2):197-205.
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Nov 26.

Brain natriuretic peptide in the evaluation of emergency department dyspnea: is there a role?

Affiliations

Brain natriuretic peptide in the evaluation of emergency department dyspnea: is there a role?

Christopher R Carpenter et al. J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Acute decompensated congestive heart failure (ADCHF) is a common etiology of dyspnea in emergency department (ED) patients. Delayed diagnosis of ADCHF increases morbidity and mortality. Two cardiac biomarkers, N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) have demonstrated excellent sensitivity in diagnostic accuracy studies, but the clinical impact on patient-oriented outcomes of these tests remains in question.

Clinical question: Does emergency physician awareness of BNP or NT-proBNP level improve ADCHF patient-important outcomes including ED length of stay, hospital length of stay, cardiovascular mortality, or overall health care costs?

Evidence review: Five trials have randomized clinicians to either knowledge of or no knowledge of ADCHF biomarker levels in ED patients with dyspnea and some suspicion for heart failure. In assessing patient-oriented outcomes such as length-of-stay, return visits, and overall health care costs, the randomized controlled trials fail to provide evidence of unequivocal benefit to patients, clinicians, or society.

Conclusion: Clinician awareness of BNP or NT-proBNP levels in ED dyspnea patients does not necessarily improve outcomes. Future ADCHF biomarker trials must assess patient-oriented outcomes in conjunction with validated risk-stratification instruments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical decision thresholds for diagnostic testing and therapy (20).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evidence-based medicine teaching points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green SM, Martinez-Rumayor A, Gregory SA, et al. Clinical uncertainty, diagnostic accuracy, and outcomes in emergency department patients presenting with dyspnea. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:741–748. - PubMed
    1. Abhayaratna WP, Smith WT, Becker NG, Marwick Th, Jeffery IM, McGill DA. Prevalence of heart failure and systolic ventricular dysfunction in older Australians: the Canberra Heart Study. Med J Aust. 2006;184:151–154. - PubMed
    1. Roberts DC, McKay MP, Shaffer A. Increasing rates of emergency department visits for elderly patients in the United States, 1993 to 2003. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:769–774. - PubMed
    1. Fonarow GC. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE): opportunities to improve care of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003;(4 Suppl 7):S21–S30. - PubMed
    1. American Heart Association (AHA) Dallas, TX: AHA; 2010. American Heart Association heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 Update.

MeSH terms