A rational analysis of the acquisition of multisensory representations
- PMID: 22141921
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01216.x
A rational analysis of the acquisition of multisensory representations
Abstract
How do people learn multisensory, or amodal, representations, and what consequences do these representations have for perceptual performance? We address this question by performing a rational analysis of the problem of learning multisensory representations. This analysis makes use of a Bayesian nonparametric model that acquires latent multisensory features that optimally explain the unisensory features arising in individual sensory modalities. The model qualitatively accounts for several important aspects of multisensory perception: (a) it integrates information from multiple sensory sources in such a way that it leads to superior performances in, for example, categorization tasks; (b) its performances suggest that multisensory training leads to better learning than unisensory training, even when testing is conducted in unisensory conditions; (c) its multisensory representations are modality invariant; and (d) it predicts ''missing" sensory representations in modalities when the input to those modalities is absent. Our rational analysis indicates that all of these aspects emerge as part of the optimal solution to the problem of learning to represent complex multisensory environments.
Copyright © 2011 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Benefits of multisensory learning.Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008. PMID: 18805039 Review.
-
Sound facilitates visual learning.Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 25;16(14):1422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.048. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16860741
-
Visual learning in multisensory environments.Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;2(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01056.x. Epub 2009 Nov 4. Top Cogn Sci. 2010. PMID: 25163785
-
Enhanced multisensory integration and motor reactivation after active motor learning of audiovisual associations.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3515-28. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00015. Epub 2011 Mar 31. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21452947
-
The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories.Multisens Res. 2013;26(5):483-502. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002426. Multisens Res. 2013. PMID: 24649531 Review.
Cited by
-
Facilitation and interference effects of the multisensory context on learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1334-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01733-4. Epub 2022 Sep 15. Psychol Res. 2023. PMID: 36107248
-
Distinct neurocognitive fingerprints reflect differential associations with risky and impulsive behavior in a neurotypical sample.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 21;13(1):11782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38991-0. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37479846 Free PMC article.
-
The computational origin of representation.Minds Mach (Dordr). 2021 Mar;31:1-58. doi: 10.1007/s11023-020-09540-9. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Minds Mach (Dordr). 2021. PMID: 34305318 Free PMC article.
-
Generalisation to novel exemplars of learned shape categories based on visual and auditory spatial cues does not benefit from multisensory information.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug 5. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02548-7. Online ahead of print. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 39103708
-
The origins and structure of quantitative concepts.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012;29(1-2):149-73. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.707122. Epub 2012 Sep 12. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012. PMID: 22966853 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
