A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital?
- PMID: 22147882
- PMCID: PMC4440579
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963868
A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital?
Abstract
Background: In 2001, 1176 US hospitals were capable of performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 79% of the population lived within 60-minute ground transport of these hospitals. We compared these estimates with data from 2006 to explore how hospital PCI capability and population access have changed over time.
Methods and results: We estimated the proportion of the population 18 years of age or older, living in 2006 within a 60-minute drive of a PCI-capable hospital, and we compared our estimate with a previously published report on 2001 data. Over the 5-year period, the number of PCI-capable hospitals grew from 1176 to 1695 hospitals, a relative increase of 44%; access to the procedure grew from 79.0% to 79.9% of the population, a relative increase of 1%.
Conclusions: Our data indicate a large increase in the number of hospitals capable of performing PCI from 2001 to 2006, but this increase was not associated with an appreciable change in the proportion of the population with access to the procedure. In the future, more attention is needed on changes in PCI capacity over time and on the effects of these changes on outcomes of interest such as service utilization, expenditures, patient outcomes, and population health.
Figures
Comment in
-
Universal access to a percutaneous coronary intervention hospital: is it feasible or desirable?Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):9-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964270. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012. PMID: 22253368 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Universal access to a percutaneous coronary intervention hospital: is it feasible or desirable?Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):9-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964270. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012. PMID: 22253368 No abstract available.
-
Driving times and distances to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: implications for prehospital triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Circulation. 2006 Mar 7;113(9):1189-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.596346. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16520425
-
Treatment delays in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute.Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl B(Suppl B):53B-57B. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)71011-5. Can J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17932588 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):738-46. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1348. Epub 2008 Sep 30. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008. PMID: 18825133 Review.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Feb;8(2):79-90. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.184. Epub 2010 Dec 7. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21139558 Review.
Cited by
-
Structural Inequities In The Adoption Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Services By US Hospitals, 2000-20.Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jul;43(7):1011-1020. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01649. Health Aff (Millwood). 2024. PMID: 38950302
-
High-Frequency, 2-mm-Diameter Forward-Viewing 2-D Array for 3-D Intracoronary Blood Flow Imaging.IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2024 Aug;71(8):1051-1061. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3418708. Epub 2024 Aug 19. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2024. PMID: 38913530
-
Physician Transfer Versus Patient Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e031906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031906. Epub 2024 Jun 20. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38899767 Free PMC article.
-
Distribution of catheterisation laboratories in Indonesia 2017-2022: a nationwide survey.Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 May 10;26:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100418. eCollection 2024 Jul. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024. PMID: 38764713 Free PMC article.
-
Is more better? A multilevel analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention hospital openings and closures on patient volumes.Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;31(10):994-1005. doi: 10.1111/acem.14926. Epub 2024 May 16. Acad Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38752293
References
-
- Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20. - PubMed
-
- Kent DM, Lau J, Selker HP. Balancing the benefits of primary angioplasty against the benefits of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the importance of timing. Effect Clin Pract. 2001;4:214–220. - PubMed
-
- Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:824–826. - PubMed
-
- Jacobs AK. Regionalized care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: it’s closer than you think. Circulation. 2006;113:1159–1161. - PubMed
-
- Jacobs AK, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Gregory T, Solis P. Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation. 2007;116:217–230. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
