Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;50(1):58-65.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182290349.

Impact of bariatric surgery on health care utilization and costs among patients with diabetes

Affiliations

Impact of bariatric surgery on health care utilization and costs among patients with diabetes

Sara N Bleich et al. Med Care. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The effect of bariatric surgery on health care utilization and costs among individuals with type 2 diabetes remains unclear.

Objective: To examine health care utilization and costs in an insured cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery.

Research design: Cohort study derived from administrative data from 2002 to 2008 from 7 Blue Cross Blue Shield Plans.

Participants: Seven thousand eight hundred six individuals with type 2 diabetes who had bariatric surgery.

Measures: Cost (inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy, and others) and utilization (number of inpatient days, outpatient visits, specialist visits).

Results: Compared with presurgical costs, the ratio of hospital costs (excluding the initial surgery), among beneficiaries who had any hospital costs, was higher in years 2 through 6 of the postsurgery period and increased over time [post 1: odds ratio (OR)=0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.50-0.67; post 6: OR=3.43; 95% CI, 2.60-4.53]. In comparison with the presurgical period, the odds of having any health care costs was lower in the postsurgery period and remained relatively flat over time. Among those with hospitalizations, the adjusted ratio of inpatient days was higher after surgery (post 1: OR=1.05; 95% CI, 0.94-1.16; post 6: OR=2.77; 95% CI, 1.57-4.90). Among those with primary care visits, the adjusted OR was lower after surgery (post 1: OR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.82; post 6: OR=0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.76).

Conclusions: : In the 6 years after surgery, individuals with type 2 diabetes did not have lower health care costs than before surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted Odds of Any Costs and Adjusted Ratio of Mean Total Costs in Post-surgical Periods compared to Pre-surgical Period † Probability of having any positive costs ( formula image) ‡ Cost ratio conditional on having any positive costs ( formula image) Notes: Each post year refers to time after surgery. For example, “Post 1” is equivalent to the first year after surgery. The squares represent the point estimate for each year along with the corresponding confidence interval. The model controlled for morbidity level, Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI), sex, health plan site, linear age, and obesity propensity. Y-axes are presented on logarithmic scales.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted Odds of a Hospitalization and Adjusted Ratio of Counts of Hospitalization in Post-surgical Periods compared to Pre-surgical Period † Probability of having no hospitalizations ( formula image) ‡ Count ratio conditional on having any hospitalization ( formula image) Notes: Each post year refers to time after surgery. For example, “Post 1” is equivalent to the first year after surgery. The squares represent the point estimate for each year along with the corresponding confidence interval. The model controlled for morbidity level, Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI), sex, health plan site, linear age, and obesity propensity. We used the biased corrected percentile confidence intervals (rather than the normal theory confidence intervals) to account for the skewed nature of the data. Y-axes are presented on logarithmic scales. The odds ratio for post-year 1 is OR = 3.27 × 10−11 (95% CI: 6.24 × 10−16, 1.72 × 10−6).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adjusted Ratio of Counts of Specialist Visits in Post-surgical Periods compared to Pre-surgical Period † Probability of having no specialist visits ( formula image) ‡ Count ratio conditional on having any specialist visits ( formula image) Notes: Each post year refers to time after surgery. For example, “Post 1” is equivalent to the first year after surgery. The squares represent the point estimate for each year along with the corresponding confidence interval. The model controlled for morbidity level, diabetes severity index, sex, health plan site, linear age, and obesity propensity. We used the biased corrected percentile confidence intervals (rather than the normal theory confidence intervals) to account for the skewed nature of the data. Y-axes are presented on logarithmic scales.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted Ratio of Counts of Primary Care Visits in Post-surgical Periods compared to Pre-surgical Period † Probability of having no primary care visits ( formula image) ‡ Count ratio conditional on having any primary care visits ( formula image) Notes: Each post year refers to time after surgery. For example, “Post 1” is equivalent to the first year after surgery. The squares represent the point estimate for each year along with the corresponding confidence interval. The model controlled for morbidity level, diabetes severity index, sex, health plan site, linear age, and obesity propensity. We used the biased corrected percentile confidence intervals (rather than the normal theory confidence intervals) to account for the skewed nature of the data. Y-axes are presented on logarithmic scales.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1549–55. - PubMed
    1. Finkelstein EA, Trogdon JG, Cohen JW, et al. Annual Medical Spending Attributable To Obesity: Payer- And Service-Specific Estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009 Jul 27; - PubMed
    1. Klein Woolthuis EP, de Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH, et al. Yield of opportunistic targeted screening for type 2 diabetes in primary care: the diabscreen study. Ann Fam Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;7(5):422–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, et al. The economic burden of diabetes. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010 Feb;29(2):297–303. - PubMed
    1. McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, et al. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):933–49. - PubMed

Publication types