Background: There is an ongoing debate over certain aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over open appendectomy (OA) in regard to hospitalization costs and associated complications.
Methods: A database was used to obtain the charts for either LA or OA performed during a 5-year period. Variables analyzed were age, gender, hospitalization cost, length of stay and complications.
Results: Of 1792 appendectomies performed, 633 (35.3%) were OA and 1159 (64.6%) were LA. Both groups were statistically similar with regard to gender (p = 0.075) but differed with respect to age, demonstrating an older patient population in the LA group (p <0.0001). Length of stay was significantly higher in the OA group (3.33 vs. 2.52) days, p <0.0001). The overall hospitalization cost of LA was 25% higher than the OA cost (p = 0.0005). The cost of an uncomplicated LA case was 1.7 times higher than in the OA group (p ≤ 0.0001). We found no statistically significant differences between the hospitalization cost of an OA and LA group when both procedures were associated with a complication (p = 0.5319). A higher complication rate was observed in the OA group, 60 cases (9.47%) as compared to the LA group, 46 cases (3.96%), p <0.0001. The increased rate of complications observed was related to cardiovascular, wound and infectious problems.
Conclusions: Noncomplicated LA was associated with a higher hospitalization cost. There was no difference with regard to complicated cases. The incidence of complications increased in the OA group.