Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;86(1):48-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

Primary care physicians' perceptions of rates of unintended pregnancy

Affiliations

Primary care physicians' perceptions of rates of unintended pregnancy

Sara M Parisi et al. Contraception. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) treat many women of reproductive age who need contraceptive and preconception counseling.

Study design: To evaluate perceptions of rates of unintended pregnancy, we distributed an online survey in 2009 to 550 PCPs trained in General Internal Medicine or Family Medicine practicing in Western Pennsylvania, Central Pennsylvania, Rhode Island or Oregon.

Results: Surveys were completed by 172 PCPs (31%). The majority (54%) of respondents underestimated the prevalence of unintended pregnancy in the United States [on average, by 23±8 (mean±SD) percentage points], and 81% underestimated the risk of pregnancy among women using no contraception [on average, by 35±20 (mean±SD) percentage points]. PCPs also frequently underestimated contraceptive failure rates with typical use: 85% underestimated the failure rate for oral contraceptive pills, 62% for condoms and 16% for contraceptive injections. PCPs more often overestimated the failure rate of intrauterine devices (17%) than other prescription methods. In adjusted models, male PCPs were significantly more likely to underestimate the rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States than female PCPs [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.17 (1.01-4.66)].

Conclusions: Many PCPs have inaccurate perceptions of rates of unintended pregnancy, both with and without use of contraception, which may influence the frequency and the content of the contraceptive counseling they provide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of PCPs’ perceptions of US unintended pregnancy rates, risk of pregnancy if using no contraception and typical-use failure rates of available methods per 100 woman–years, with dotted line indicating the correct response, n=172.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex and Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96. - PubMed
    1. Cheng D, Schwarz EB, Douglas E, Horon I. Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception. 2009;79:194–198. - PubMed
    1. Tsui AO, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:152–174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Family Plann. 2008;39:18–38. - PubMed
    1. Schoelle SH, Chang JC, Harman J, McNeil M. Trends in women’s health services by type of physician seen: data from the 1985 and 1997–98 NAMCS. Women Health Iss. 2002;12:165–177. - PubMed

Publication types