Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Jun;27(6):653-60.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1945-9. Epub 2011 Dec 17.

Medical center characteristics associated with PSA screening in elderly veterans with limited life expectancy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Medical center characteristics associated with PSA screening in elderly veterans with limited life expectancy

Cynthia So et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Although guidelines recommend against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in elderly men with limited life expectancy, screening is common.

Objective: We sought to identify medical center characteristics associated with screening in this population.

Design/participants: We conducted a prospective study of 622,262 screen-eligible men aged 70+ seen at 104 VA medical centers in 2003.

Main measures: Primary outcome was the percentage of men at each center who received PSA screening in 2003, based on VA data and Medicare claims. Men were stratified into life expectancy groups ranging from favorable (age 70-79 with Charlson score = 0) to limited (age 85+ with Charlson score ≥1 or age 70+ with Charlson score ≥4). Medical center characteristics were obtained from the 1999-2000 VA Survey of Primary Care Practices and publicly available VA data sources.

Key results: Among 123,223 (20%) men with limited life expectancy, 45% received PSA screening in 2003. Across 104 VAs, the PSA screening rate among men with limited life expectancy ranged from 25-79% (median 43%). Higher screening was associated with the following center characteristics: no academic affiliation (50% vs. 43%, adjusted RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25), a ratio of midlevel providers to physicians ≥3:4 (55% vs. 45%, adjusted RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32) and location in the South (49% vs. 39% in the West, adjusted RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.12-1.40). Use of incentives and high scores on performance measures were not independently associated with screening. Within centers, the percentages of men screened with limited and favorable life expectancies were highly correlated (r = 0.90).

Conclusions: Substantial practice variation exists for PSA screening in older men with limited life expectancy across VAs. The high center-specific correlation of screening among men with limited and favorable life expectancies indicates that PSA screening is poorly targeted according to life expectancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Exclusions used to define the final cohort of elderly men eligible for PSA screening.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage of men aged 70 and older who received PSA screening at each of 104 VAs. VAs with the highest screening rates are identified A-E and those with the lowest screening rates are identified F-J.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Correlation of PSA screening among older men with favorable and limited life expectancies at each of 104 VAs. Favorable life expectancy defined as men aged 70–79 with Charlson score = 0 (life expectancy >10 years). Limited life expectancy defined as men aged 85+ with Charlson score ≥1 or men aged 70+ with Charlson score ≥4 (life expectancy ≤5 years). Letters correspond to the highest and lowest screening VAs from Figure 2. The lower right quadrant is where screening is best targeted according to life expectancy (i.e., low screening in men with limited life expectancy and high screening in men with favorable life expectancy).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:27–43. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.53.1.27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greene KL, Albertsen PC, Babaian RJ, et al. Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2232–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:915–6. - PubMed
    1. Crawford ED, Grubb R, 3rd, Black A, et al. Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):355–361. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5979. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stamatiou K, Alevizos A, Mariolis A, et al. Do clinically insignificant tumors of the prostate exist? Urol Int. 2008;81(4):379–382. doi: 10.1159/000167832. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances