Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;27(10):1334-48.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1949-5. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review

Joanne L Callen  1 , Johanna I Westbrook, Andrew Georgiou, Julie Li
Affiliations
Review

Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review

Joanne L Callen et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Serious lapses in patient care result from failure to follow-up test results.

Objective: To systematically review evidence quantifying the extent of failure to follow-up test results and the impact for ambulatory patients.

Data sources: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Inspec and the Cochrane Database were searched for English-language literature from 1995 to 2010.

Study selection: Studies which provided documented quantitative evidence of the number of tests not followed up for patients attending ambulatory settings including: outpatient clinics, academic medical or community health centres, or primary care practices.

Data extraction: Four reviewers independently screened 768 articles.

Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported wide variation in the extent of tests not followed-up: 6.8% (79/1163) to 62% (125/202) for laboratory tests; 1.0% (4/395) to 35.7% (45/126) for radiology. The impact on patient outcomes included missed cancer diagnoses. Test management practices varied between settings with many individuals involved in the process. There were few guidelines regarding responsibility for patient notification and follow-up. Quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of electronic test management systems was limited although there was a general trend towards improved test follow-up when electronic systems were used.

Limitations: Most studies used medical record reviews; hence evidence of follow-up action relied upon documentation in the medical record. All studies were conducted in the US so care should be taken in generalising findings to other countries.

Conclusions: Failure to follow-up test results is an important safety concern which requires urgent attention. Solutions should be multifaceted and include: policies relating to responsibility, timing and process of notification; integrated information and communication technologies facilitating communication; and consideration of the multidisciplinary nature of the process and the role of the patient. It is essential that evaluations of interventions are undertaken and solutions integrated into the work and context of ambulatory care delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual framework of the testing process (Source Hickner et al. 2008, p.195).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Search flow for failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients, including keywords and MeSH terms used in search process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hickner JM, Fernald DH, Harris DM, Poon EG, Elder NC, Mold JW. Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(2):81–89. - PubMed
    1. Casalino LP, Dunham D, Chin MH, Bielang R, Kistner EO, Karrison TG, et al. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123–1129. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Alliance for Patient Safety. World Health Organisation. Summary of the Evidence on Patient Safety: Implications for Research. In: Jha A, ed; 2008:1–118.
    1. Schiff GD.Getting Results—Reliably Communicating and Acting on Critical Test Results: Joint Commission Resources; 2006.
    1. Elder NC, Graham D, Brandt E, Dovey S, Phillips P, Ledwith J, et al. The Testing Process in Family Medicine: Problems Solutions and Barriers as Seen by Physicians and Their Staff. A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network. J Patient Saf. 2006;2(1):25–32.