Long-term results of face lift surgery: patient photographs compared with patient satisfaction ratings
- PMID: 22186515
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182362b55
Long-term results of face lift surgery: patient photographs compared with patient satisfaction ratings
Abstract
Background: Surgical facial rejuvenation (face lift) remains the aesthetic standard for correction of the anatomical changes of the aging face and for long-lasting results. However, younger patients (younger than 50 years) with early facial aging are often fearful of or discouraged from face-lift surgery in favor of simpler yet short-lived nonsurgical and surgical options. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system-platysma face lift is associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction at 1 year (97.8 percent) and at 12.6 years (68.5 percent). When the satisfaction scores were subdivided into three age groups (younger than 50, 50 to 60, and older than 60 years), the authors found greater satisfaction among the younger age group at the early and long-term intervals. To illustrate these observations, the authors analyzed the photographic results of their survey patients and compared them with their survey results.
Methods: The photographic results of the patients from our Owsley Facelift Satisfaction Survey were analyzed and stratified into the three age groups. Six patients (two per age group) were included for analysis and are presented for review.
Results: Patient-rated survey results show that the younger age group consistently scored higher positive ratings, longer lasting aesthetic improvement of their five main anatomical areas of correction, and greater overall satisfaction at long-term follow-up.
Conclusions: Younger patients with early or minimal signs of facial aging should be considered candidates for surgical facial rejuvenation ("maintenance face lifts") and are the preferred candidates. This age group of patients has consistently positive overall satisfaction with longer lasting facial aesthetic correction.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.
Similar articles
-
The measure of face-lift patient satisfaction: the Owsley Facelift Satisfaction Survey with a long-term follow-up study.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jul;126(1):245-257. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc2f0. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20224460
-
Turning Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence Recognition of Age Reduction after Face-Lift Surgery Correlates with Patient Satisfaction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):45-54. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008020. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 34181603
-
An Approach to Selection of Face-Lift Techniques for Different Types of Faces: An Analysis of 1000 Asian Patients Over 9 Years.Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2):153-162. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003982. Epub 2024 Jul 10. Ann Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38984658
-
The Minimal Access Cranial Suspension Lift.Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;46(4):547-557. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Clin Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31514807 Review.
-
Aesthetic Surgical Enhancement of the Upper Lip: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Feb;45(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01871-3. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 32676900 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of tissue response and lifting effect induced by non-absorbable elastic thread and commercialized threads in rat model.Regen Biomater. 2024 Jun 17;11:rbae069. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbae069. eCollection 2024. Regen Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39055305 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Relapse After Facelift.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):144-155. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02894-8. Epub 2022 May 9. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 35534779 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
