Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 6 (4), 257-67

The Use of Masks and Respirators to Prevent Transmission of Influenza: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Evidence

Affiliations
Review

The Use of Masks and Respirators to Prevent Transmission of Influenza: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Evidence

Faisal Bin-Reza et al. Influenza Other Respir Viruses.

Abstract

There are limited data on the use of masks and respirators to reduce transmission of influenza. A systematic review was undertaken to help inform pandemic influenza guidance in the United Kingdom. The initial review was performed in November 2009 and updated in June 2010 and January 2011. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental and observational studies of humans published in English with an outcome of laboratory-confirmed or clinically-diagnosed influenza and other viral respiratory infections. There were 17 eligible studies. Six of eight randomised controlled trials found no significant differences between control and intervention groups (masks with or without hand hygiene; N95/P2 respirators). One household trial found that mask wearing coupled with hand sanitiser use reduced secondary transmission of upper respiratory infection/influenza-like illness/laboratory-confirmed influenza compared with education; hand sanitiser alone resulted in no reduction. One hospital-based trial found a lower rate of clinical respiratory illness associated with non-fit-tested N95 respirator use compared with medical masks. Eight of nine retrospective observational studies found that mask and/or respirator use was independently associated with a reduced risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Findings, however, may not be applicable to influenza and many studies were suboptimal. None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection. Some evidence suggests that mask use is best undertaken as part of a package of personal protection especially hand hygiene. The effectiveness of masks and respirators is likely linked to early, consistent and correct usage.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of search strategy results and article selection for three searches. 1Includes 3 papers that were sought for review and abstraction in the first search. 2Includes 6 papers that were sought for review and abstraction in the second search. 3One of these papers (reference no. 6) became available on‐line on 27 January 2011. 4Reasons for exclusion included an inability to distinguish the effect of mask use from other personal protective equipment or lack of quantitative data.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Department of Health . UK influenza pandemic preparedness strategy 2011: strategy for consultation. 22 March 2011. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_125316 (Accessed 25 March 2011).
    1. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York . CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. 2009. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/systematic_reviews_book.htm (Accessed 22 December 2009).
    1. National Health Service Critical Appraisal Skills Programme . Available at http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/CASP.htm (Accessed 16 November 2009).
    1. Jacobs JL, Ohde S, Takahashi O, Tokuda Y, Omata F, Fukui T. Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control 2009; 37:417–419. - PubMed
    1. Loeb M, Dafoe N, Mahony J et al. Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 302:1865–1871. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Feedback