Stepwise age-related outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 11-year institutional review

Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2011 Dec;23(4):280-90. doi: 10.1177/1531003511430396. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) has largely supplanted open surgery over the past 2 decades. Faced with an aging population, the outcomes of EVAR among various age groups were examined.

Method: Retrospective review of elective EVAR cases was performed at a single institution from 1998 to 2009. Patients were separated into 4 age groups for easy comparison. Perioperative data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

Results: Demographics were similar among the groups except for sex, BMI, and smoking status. The 30-day morbidity and mortality data were not statistically different among groups. From EVAR to end of the study, there was a 10.9% all-cause mortality rate (with no difference among groups) and an 8.0% reintervention rate (with the oldest age group having a lower reintervention rate; P < .03).

Conclusions: EVAR remains a good treatment option for elective aneurysm repair despite advanced age, which alone does not appear to be an independent predictor of outcome.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / mortality
  • Chicago
  • Elective Surgical Procedures
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures* / mortality
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome