The connection between selective referrals for radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy and volume-outcome effects: an instrumental variables analysis
- PMID: 22205768
- DOI: 10.1177/1062860611423728
The connection between selective referrals for radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy and volume-outcome effects: an instrumental variables analysis
Abstract
This study delineates the roles of "selective referrals" and "practice makes perfect" in the hospital procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association for radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy. This is a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (years 2000-2004). All hospitalizations with primary procedure codes for radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy were selected. The association between hospital procedure volume and in-hospital mortality was examined using generalized estimating equations and by instrumental variables approaches. There was an inverse association between hospital procedure volume and in-hospital mortality for radical cystectomy (odds ratio = 0.57; 95% confidence interval = 0.38-0.87; P < .05). Results from the 2-stages least squares regression approach suggested that receiving treatment in high-volume hospitals decreased the probability of in-hospital mortality by 0.02 points, compared with 0.01 points using the ordinary least squares regression approach. Outcomes following radical cystectomy appear to be driven by "practice makes perfect."
Similar articles
-
Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better?J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2006-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2622. J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16648501
-
The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):867-9. J Urol. 2000. PMID: 10687994
-
Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project.J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1695-700. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154638.61621.03. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15821560
-
A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer procedures.J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2145-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140257.05714.45. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15538220 Review.
-
Assessing the quality of the volume-outcome relationship in uro-oncology.BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(3):341-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08021.x. Epub 2008 Oct 16. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 18990134 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimal surgeon and hospital volume thresholds to reduce mortality and length of stay for CABG.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249750. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33852641 Free PMC article.
-
The Volume-Outcome Relationship Revisited: Practice Indeed Makes Perfect.Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):15-34. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12696. Epub 2017 Sep 4. Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 28868612 Free PMC article.
-
Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 15;191(8):894-901. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201409-1634OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25695688 Free PMC article.
-
Who does not receive treatment for cancer?J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jan;9(1):20-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000829. J Oncol Pract. 2013. PMID: 23633967 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
