Spinal manipulation, medication, or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain: a randomized trial
- PMID: 22213489
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00002
Spinal manipulation, medication, or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Mechanical neck pain is a common condition that affects an estimated 70% of persons at some point in their lives. Little research exists to guide the choice of therapy for acute and subacute neck pain.
Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), medication, and home exercise with advice (HEA) for acute and subacute neck pain in both the short and long term.
Design: Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00029770)
Setting: 1 university research center and 1 pain management clinic in Minnesota.
Participants: 272 persons aged 18 to 65 years who had nonspecific neck pain for 2 to 12 weeks.
Intervention: 12 weeks of SMT, medication, or HEA.
Measurements: The primary outcome was participant-rated pain, measured at 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. Secondary measures were self-reported disability, global improvement, medication use, satisfaction, general health status (Short Form-36 Health Survey physical and mental health scales), and adverse events. Blinded evaluation of neck motion was performed at 4 and 12 weeks.
Results: For pain, SMT had a statistically significant advantage over medication after 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks (P ≤ 0.010), and HEA was superior to medication at 26 weeks (P = 0.02). No important differences in pain were found between SMT and HEA at any time point. Results for most of the secondary outcomes were similar to those of the primary outcome.
Limitations: Participants and providers could not be blinded. No specific criteria for defining clinically important group differences were prespecified or available from the literature.
Conclusion: For participants with acute and subacute neck pain, SMT was more effective than medication in both the short and long term. However, a few instructional sessions of HEA resulted in similar outcomes at most time points.
Primary funding source: National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Comment in
-
Pain in the neck: many (marginally different) treatment choices.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 1):52-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22213495 No abstract available.
-
Acute and subacute neck pain.Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):668; author reply 669. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22547481 No abstract available.
-
Acute and subacute neck pain.Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):669; author reply 669. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00018. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22547482 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients: is spinal manipulation an effective treatment for neck pain?Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 1):I30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22213509 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Supervised exercise with and without spinal manipulation performs similarly and better than home exercise for chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):903-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b3bdf. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22024905 Clinical Trial.
-
Summaries for patients: is spinal manipulation an effective treatment for neck pain?Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 1):I30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22213509 No abstract available.
-
Spinal manipulation and home exercise with advice for subacute and chronic back-related leg pain: a trial with adaptive allocation.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 16;161(6):381-91. doi: 10.7326/M14-0006. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25222385 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis.Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):335-56. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.002. Spine J. 2004. PMID: 15125860 Review.
-
A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 15;29(14):1541-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000131218.35875.ed. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15247576 Review.
Cited by
-
Immediate efficacy of acupuncture combined with active exercise as 10 min rapid therapy for pain and movement disorders in patients suffering from acute stiff neck: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 23;14(7):e080793. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080793. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39043589 Free PMC article.
-
How well do participants in clinical trials represent the U.S. population with chronic neck or back pain?BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 27;25(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07524-9. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38802802 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy when compared with oral pain medications in patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 16;16(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00874-w. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 38627846 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The majority of clinical trials assessing mobilization and manipulation for neck pain lack a pragmatic approach: a systematic review of 174 trials.J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Oct;32(5):478-494. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2327127. Epub 2024 Mar 25. J Man Manip Ther. 2024. PMID: 38525785
-
Efficacy of Combining Traditional Chinese Manual Therapy (Tuina) and Specific Therapeutic Neck Exercise in Young Adults with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.J Pain Res. 2023 Sep 13;16:3119-3131. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S424812. eCollection 2023. J Pain Res. 2023. PMID: 37724170 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical