What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis
- PMID: 22215270
- PMCID: PMC3358396
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1958-4
What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis
Abstract
Background: Doctor rating websites are a burgeoning trend, yet little is known about their content.
Objective: To explore the content of Internet reviews about primary care physicians.
Design: Qualitative content analysis of 712 online reviews from two rating websites. We purposively sampled reviews of 445 primary care doctors (internists and family practitioners) from four geographically dispersed U.S. urban locations. We report the major themes, and because this is a large sample, the frequencies of domains within our coding scheme.
Results: Most reviews (63%) were positive, recommending the physician. We found a major distinction between global reviews, "Dr. B is a great doctor." vs. specific descriptions which included interpersonal manner, "She always listens to what I have to say and answers all my questions."; technical competence "No matter who she has recommended re: MD specialists, this MD has done everything right."; and/or systems issues such as appointment and telephone access. Among specific reviews, interpersonal manner "Dr. A is so compassionate." and technical competence "He is knowledgeable, will research your case before giving you advice." comments tended to be more positive (69% and 80%, respectively), whereas systems-issues comments "Staff is so-so, less professional than should be…" were more mixed (60% positive, 40% negative).
Conclusions: The majority of Internet reviews of primary care physicians are positive in nature. Our findings reaffirm that the care encounter extends beyond the patient-physician dyad; staff, access, and convenience all affect patient's reviews of physicians. In addition, negative interpersonal reviews underscore the importance of well-perceived bedside manner for a successful patient-physician interaction.
Figures
Similar articles
-
What parents say about their child's surgeon: parent-reported experiences with pediatric surgical physicians.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;140(5):397-402. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.102. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014. PMID: 24651973
-
Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:510-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.047. Epub 2019 Aug 22. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 31446193
-
A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.Int J Med Inform. 2017 Mar;99:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 5. Int J Med Inform. 2017. PMID: 28118920
-
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27165558 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Reviewing the Raters: A Study of Orthopedic Oncology Rating Outcomes During COVID-19.Cureus. 2024 Oct 4;16(10):e70829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70829. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39493175 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of Patients' Judgments of Their Physicians in Web-Based Written Reviews Using Natural Language Processing: Algorithm Development and Validation.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e50236. doi: 10.2196/50236. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39088259 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing extremely negative online patient reviews and complaints of musculoskeletal oncology surgeons in the United States: a retrospective analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 23;19(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04881-y. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39044200 Free PMC article.
-
What Patients Say About Their Orthopaedic Hand and Wrist Surgeons: A Qualitative Analysis of Negative Reviews on Yelp.J Wrist Surg. 2023 Aug 17;13(3):202-207. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768924. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Wrist Surg. 2023. PMID: 38808180 Free PMC article.
-
Online Physician-Patient Interaction and Patient Satisfaction: Empirical Study of the Internet Hospital Service.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 24;25:e39089. doi: 10.2196/39089. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37616031 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shinchuk LM, Chiou P, Czarnowski V, Meleger AL. Demographics and attitudes of chronic-pain patients who seek online pain-related medical information: implications for healthcare providers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil;89(2):141-6. - PubMed
-
- Rochman B. Health group therapy. Why so many patients are sharing their medical data online. Time;175(5):47-8. - PubMed
-
- Frost J, Massagli M. PatientsLikeMe the case for a data-centered patient community and how ALS patients use the community to inform treatment decisions and manage pulmonary health. Chron Respir Dis. 2009;6(4):225–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
