Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jan 1;35(1):49-60.
doi: 10.5665/sleep.1584.

A randomized controlled trial of intensive sleep retraining (ISR): a brief conditioning treatment for chronic insomnia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of intensive sleep retraining (ISR): a brief conditioning treatment for chronic insomnia

Jodie Harris et al. Sleep. .

Abstract

Study objective: To investigate the effectiveness of intensive sleep retraining in comparison and combination with traditional behavioral intervention for chronic primary insomnia.

Participants: Seventy-nine volunteers with chronic sleep-onset insomnia (with or without sleep maintenance difficulties) were randomly assigned either to intensive sleep retraining (ISR), stimulus control therapy (SCT), ISR plus SCT, or the control (sleep hygiene) treatment condition.

Intervention: ISR treatment consisted of 50 sleep onset trials over a 25-h sleep deprivation period.

Measurements and results: Treatment response was assessed with sleep diary, activity monitoring, and questionnaire measures. The active treatment groups (ISR, SCT, ISR+SCT) all resulted in significant improvements in sleep onset latency and sleep efficiency, with moderate to large effect sizes from pre- to post-treatment. Wake time after sleep onset decreased significantly in the SCT and ISR+SCT groups. Total sleep time increased significantly in the ISR and ISR+SCT treatment groups. Participants receiving ISR (ISR, ISR+SCT) experienced rapidly improved SOL and TST during treatment, suggesting an advantage of rapid improvements in sleep in response to ISR. Although there were few statistically significant differences between groups on individual variables, ISR+SCT resulted in consistently larger effect sizes of change than other treatments, including questionnaire measures of sleep quality, sleep self-efficacy, and daytime functioning. The combination treatment group (ISR+SCT) showed trends to outperform other active treatment groups with fewer treatment dropouts, and a greater proportion of treatment responders with 61% reaching "good sleeper" status. Treatment gains achieved at post-treatment in the active treatment groups were largely maintained throughout follow-up periods to 6 months.

Conclusion: This 25-hour intensive conditioning treatment for chronic insomnia can produce rapid improvements in sleep, daytime functioning, and psychological variables. Adding ISR to traditional interventions seems to result in a superior treatment response.

Keywords: Chronic insomnia; behavioral treatment; classical conditioning; intensive sleep retraining.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research design and participant flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean sleep onset latency (SOL) and Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) score by trial number during the intensive sleep retraining (ISR) treatment procedure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean sleep diary sleep onset latencies (SOL) prior to, during, and following treatment. * Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from control.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean sleep diary total sleep time (TST) prior to, during, and following treatment. *Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from control, †Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from SCT.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean sleep diary wake time after sleep onset (WASO) prior to, during, and following treatment. *Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from control, °Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from ISR.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean sleep diary sleep efficiency (SE) prior to, during and following treatment. *Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.01) from control. °Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from ISR. Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) from SCT.

Comment in

  • What a difference a day makes.
    Spielman AJ, Glovinsky PB. Spielman AJ, et al. Sleep. 2012 Jan 1;35(1):11-2. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1574. Sleep. 2012. PMID: 22215913 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bootzin RR. Stimulus control treatment for insomnia. Proc Am Psychol Assoc. 1972;7:395–6.
    1. Edinger JD, Wohlgemuth WK, Radtke RA, Marsh GR, Quillian RE. Does cognitive-behavioral insomnia therapy alter dysfunctional beliefs about sleep? Sleep. 2001;24:591–9. - PubMed
    1. Mendelson WB. Long-term follow-up of chronic insomnia. Sleep. 1995;18:698–701. - PubMed
    1. Mellinger GD, Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. Insomnia and its treatment. Prevalence and correlates. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:225–32. - PubMed
    1. Morgenthaler T, Kramer M, Alessi C, et al. Practice parameters for the psychological and behavioral treatment of insomnia: an update. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine report. Sleep. 2006;29:1415–9. - PubMed

Publication types