Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 107 (7), 1246-60

The Cardioprotective Association of Average Alcohol Consumption and Ischaemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

The Cardioprotective Association of Average Alcohol Consumption and Ischaemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Michael Roerecke et al. Addiction.

Abstract

Aims: Most, but not all, epidemiological studies suggest a cardioprotective association for low to moderate average alcohol consumption. The objective was to quantify the dose-response relationship between average alcohol consumption and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) stratified by sex and IHD end-point (mortality versus morbidity).

Methods: A systematic search of published studies using electronic databases (1980-2010) identified 44 observational studies (case-control or cohort) reporting a relative risk measure for average alcohol intake in relation to IHD risk. Generalized least-squares trend models were used to derive the best-fitting dose-response curves in stratified continuous meta-analyses. Categorical meta-analyses were used to verify uncertainty for low to moderate levels of consumption in comparison to long-term abstainers.

Results: The analyses used 38,627 IHD events (mortality or morbidity) among 957,684 participants. Differential risk curves were found by sex and end-point. Although some form of a cardioprotective association was confirmed in all strata, substantial heterogeneity across studies remained unexplained and confidence intervals were relatively wide, in particular for average consumption of one to two drinks/day.

Conclusions: A cardioprotective association between alcohol use and ischaemic heart disease cannot be assumed for all drinkers, even at low levels of intake. More evidence on the overall benefit-risk ratio of average alcohol consumption in relation to ischaemic heart disease and other diseases is needed in order to inform the general public or physicians about safe or low-risk drinking levels.

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest:

All other authors have no interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using only studies completely stratified by sex and endpoint, 1980–2010. 2a) IHD mortality in men, 2b) IHD morbidity in men, 2c) IHD mortality in women, 2d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using only studies completely stratified by sex and endpoint, 1980–2010. 2a) IHD mortality in men, 2b) IHD morbidity in men, 2c) IHD mortality in women, 2d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using only studies completely stratified by sex and endpoint, 1980–2010. 2a) IHD mortality in men, 2b) IHD morbidity in men, 2c) IHD mortality in women, 2d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using only studies completely stratified by sex and endpoint, 1980–2010. 2a) IHD mortality in men, 2b) IHD morbidity in men, 2c) IHD mortality in women, 2d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using also studies with combined sex or endpoint, 1980–2010. 3a) IHD mortality in men, 3b) IHD morbidity in men, 3c) IHD mortality in women, 3d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using also studies with combined sex or endpoint, 1980–2010. 3a) IHD mortality in men, 3b) IHD morbidity in men, 3c) IHD mortality in women, 3d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using also studies with combined sex or endpoint, 1980–2010. 3a) IHD mortality in men, 3b) IHD morbidity in men, 3c) IHD mortality in women, 3d) IHD morbidity in women
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative risk functions (solid lines, on the natural log scale) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the dose-response relationship between average alcohol intake and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using also studies with combined sex or endpoint, 1980–2010. 3a) IHD mortality in men, 3b) IHD morbidity in men, 3c) IHD mortality in women, 3d) IHD morbidity in women

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 60 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles
Feedback