The cost-effectiveness of Welcome to Medicare visual acuity screening and a possible alternative welcome to medicare eye evaluation among persons without diagnosed diabetes mellitus
- PMID: 22232367
- PMCID: PMC3759517
- DOI: 10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1921
The cost-effectiveness of Welcome to Medicare visual acuity screening and a possible alternative welcome to medicare eye evaluation among persons without diagnosed diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of visual acuity screening performed in primary care settings and of dilated eye evaluations performed by an eye care professional among new Medicare enrollees with no diagnosed eye disorders. Medicare currently reimburses visual acuity screening for new enrollees during their initial preventive primary care health check, but dilated eye evaluations may be a more cost-effective policy.
Design: Monte Carlo cost-effectiveness simulation model with a total of 50 000 simulated patients with demographic characteristics matched to persons 65 years of age in the US population.
Results: Compared with no screening policy, dilated eye evaluations increased quality-adjusted life-years(QALYs) by 0.008 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.005-0.011) and increased costs by $94 (95% CrI, −$35 to$222). A visual acuity screening increased QALYs in less than 95% of the simulations (0.001 [95% CrI, −0.002 to 0.004) and increased total costs by $32 (95% CrI, −$97 to $159) per person. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a visual acuity screening and an eye examination compared with no screening were $29 000 and$12 000 per QALY gained, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay value of $15 000 or more per QALY gained, a dilated eye evaluation was the policy option most likely to be cost-effective.
Conclusions: The currently recommended visual acuity screening showed limited efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared with no screening. In contrast, anew policy of reimbursement for Welcome to Medicare dilated eye evaluations was highly cost-effective.
Figures
Comment in
-
The economics of the initial preventive physical examination in medicare.Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;130(9):1232-3; author reply 1233-4. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1217. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22965617 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The economics of the initial preventive physical examination in medicare.Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;130(9):1232-3; author reply 1233-4. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1217. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22965617 No abstract available.
-
Comparative Cost-effectiveness of the Baerveldt Implant, Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin, and Medical Treatment.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 May;133(5):560-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.44. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25741886
-
Characteristics Associated with Adherence to Annual Dilated Eye Examinations among US Patients with Diagnosed Diabetes.Ophthalmology. 2019 Nov;126(11):1492-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 31281055
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(25):iii, xi-194. doi: 10.3310/hta12250. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18513466 Review.
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840 Review.
Cited by
-
An evaluation of a community-based vision care programme for the elderly.BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 27;22(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03399-4. BMC Geriatr. 2022. PMID: 36030213 Free PMC article.
-
Mild Visual Impairment and Its Impact on Self-Care Among Older Adults.J Aging Health. 2018 Mar;30(3):327-341. doi: 10.1177/0898264316676406. Epub 2016 Nov 10. J Aging Health. 2018. PMID: 27834286 Free PMC article.
-
Geographic disparity of severe vision loss - United States, 2009-2013.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 May 22;64(19):513-7. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015. PMID: 25996092 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (2005–2008) [Accessed November 28, 2011];Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Center for Health Statistics Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.
-
- Rees G, Tee HW, Marella M, Fenwick E, Dirani M, Lamoureux EL. Vision-specific distress and depressive symptoms in people with vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):2891–2896. - PubMed
-
- Medicare preventive services. Quick reference information: the ABCs of providing the initial preventive physical examination. Components of the IPPE. [Accessed September 29, 2010];Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Web site. https://www.cms.gov/MLNProducts/downloads/MPS_QRI_IPPE001a.pdf.
-
- Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C. Screening older adults for impaired visual acuity: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(1):44–58. W11–W20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
