Personal health records and hypertension control: a randomized trial
- PMID: 22234404
- PMCID: PMC3384099
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000349
Personal health records and hypertension control: a randomized trial
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the impact of a personal health record (PHR) in patients with hypertension measured by changes in biological outcomes, patient empowerment, patient perception of quality of care, and use of medical services.
Methods: A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial with PHR and no PHR groups was conducted in two ambulatory clinics. 453 of 1686 (26.4%) patients approached were included in the analyses. A PHR tethered to the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) was the primary intervention and included security measures, patient control of access, limited transmission of EMR data, blood pressure (BP) tracking, and appointment assistance. BP was the main outcome measure. Patient empowerment was assessed using the Patient Activation Measure and Patient Empowerment Scale. Quality of care was assessed using the Clinician and Group Assessment Score (CAHPS) and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care. Frequency of use of medical services was self-reported.
Results: No impact of the PHR was observed on BP, patient activation, patient perceived quality, or medical utilization in the intention-to-treat analysis. Sub-analysis of intervention patients self-identified as active PHR users (25.7% of those with available information) showed a 5.25-point reduction in diastolic BP. Younger age, self-reported computer skills, and more positive provider communication ratings were associated with frequency of PHR use.
Conclusions: Few patients provided with a PHR actually used the PHR with any frequency. Thus simply providing a PHR may have limited impact on patient BP, empowerment, satisfaction with care, or use of health services without additional education or clinical intervention designed to increase PHR use.
Clinical trial registration number: http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01317537.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging.J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 26;15(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2243. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 23470453 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Personal Health Record on Patient Participation in Health Care: Development and Randomized Controlled Trial of MyHealthKeeper.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 7;19(12):e401. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8867. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 29217503 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr;27(4):420-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1889-0. Epub 2011 Oct 18. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22005937 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Health Record Systems Scope and Functionalities: Literature Review and Future Directions.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 15;19(11):e388. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8073. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 29141839 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Personal health records on the Internet. A narrative review of attitudes, expectations, utilization and effects on health outcomes].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 May;122:9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 10. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017. PMID: 28499764 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Patient activation, adherence to hypertension treatment plans and blood pressure control in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 25;13(1):e067862. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067862. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36697049 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 22;24(12):e43086. doi: 10.2196/43086. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36548034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Behavioral Interventions on Patient Activation in Adults with Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221090408. doi: 10.1177/00469580221090408. Inquiry. 2022. PMID: 35635036 Free PMC article.
-
A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION OF STANDALONE PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD USE BY PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2021 Oct 1;18(4):1e. eCollection 2021 Fall. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2021. PMID: 34975354 Free PMC article.
-
Patient portal engagement and diabetes management among new portal users in the Veterans Health Administration.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2176-2183. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab115. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34339500 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wilson C, Peterson A. Managing Personal Health Information: An Action Agenda: (Prepared by Insight Policy Research under Contract No. HHSA290200710072T). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality March 2010 Contract No.: AHRQ Publication No. 10-0048-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010:1
-
- Fuji KT, Galt KA, Serocca AB. Personal health record use by patients as perceived by ambulatory care physicians in Nebraska and South Dakota: a cross- sectional study. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2008;5 http://perspectives.ahima.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&... (accessed 3 Jan 2012). - PMC - PubMed
-
- Grossman JM, Zayas-Cabán T, Kemper N. Information gap: can health insurer personal health records meet patients' and physicians' needs? Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:377–89 - PubMed
-
- Kahn JS, Aulakh V, Bosworth A. What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record wider adoption of PHRs will require greater computer competency, Internet access, and health literacy. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:369–76 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
