Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;87(3):327-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.014. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Using visual displays to communicate risk of cancer to women from diverse race/ethnic backgrounds

Affiliations

Using visual displays to communicate risk of cancer to women from diverse race/ethnic backgrounds

Sabrina T Wong et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated how well women from diverse race/ethnic groups were able to take a quantitative cancer risk statistic verbally provided to them and report it in a visual format.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey was administered in English, Spanish or Chinese, to women aged 50-80 (n=1160), recruited from primary care practices. The survey contained breast, colorectal or cervical cancer questions regarding screening and prevention. Women were told cancer-specific lifetime risk then shown a visual display of risk and asked to indicate the specific lifetime risk. Correct indication of risk was the main outcome.

Results: Correct responses on icon arrays were 46% for breast, 55% for colon, and 44% for cervical; only 25% correctly responded to a magnifying glass graphic. Compared to Whites, African American and Latina women were significantly less likely to use the icon arrays correctly. Higher education and higher numeracy were associated with correct responses. Lower education was associated with lower numeracy.

Conclusions: Race/ethnic differences were associated with women's ability to take a quantitative cancer risk statistic verbally provided to them and report it in a visual format.

Practice implications: Systematically considering the complexity of intersecting factors such as race/ethnicity, educational level, poverty, and numeracy in most health communications is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wall of 100 Women Scenario for Breast and Colon Cancer Risk
Figure 2
Figure 2
Wall of 10,000 Women (Five of these Pictures put together)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Gwyn R, Grol R. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. Bmj. 1999;319(7212):753–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell CRG. Shared decision-making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003;12:93–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango) Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92. - PubMed
    1. Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Audet A-M. A 2020 Vision of Patient-Centered Primary Care. JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005;20(10):953–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lipkus I. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making. 2007;27:696–713. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms