Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing
- PMID: 22247420
- PMCID: PMC3683460
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11431608
Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes genetic risk testing might motivate at-risk patients to adopt diabetes prevention behaviors. However, the influence of literacy and numeracy on patient response to diabetes genetic risk is unknown.
Objective: The authors investigated the association of health literacy, genetic literacy, and health numeracy with patient responses to diabetes genetic risk.
Design: and Measurements Overweight patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes were recruited for a clinical trial of diabetes genetic risk testing. At baseline, participants predicted how their motivation for lifestyle modification to prevent diabetes might change in response to hypothetical scenarios of receiving "high" and "low" genetic risk results. Responses were analyzed according to participants' health literacy, genetic literacy, and health numeracy.
Results: Two-thirds (67%) of participants (n = 175) reported very high motivation to prevent diabetes. Despite high health literacy (92% at high school level), many participants had limited health numeracy (30%) and genetic literacy (38%). Almost all (98%) reported that high-risk genetic results would increase their motivation for lifestyle modification. In contrast, response to low-risk genetic results varied. Higher levels of health literacy (P = 0.04), genetic literacy (P = 0.02), and health numeracy (P = 0.02) were associated with an anticipated decrease in motivation for lifestyle modification in response to low-risk results.
Conclusions: While patients reported that high-risk genetic results would motivate them to adopt healthy lifestyle changes, response to low-risk results varied by patient numeracy and literacy. However, anticipated responses may not correlate with true behavior change. If future research justifies the clinical use of genetic testing to motivate behavior change, it may be important to assess how patient characteristics modify that motivational effect.
Figures
Comment in
-
How individual genetic test disclosure may affect population health.Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):525-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12441399. Med Decis Making. 2012. PMID: 22820483 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Design of a randomized trial of diabetes genetic risk testing to motivate behavior change: the Genetic Counseling/lifestyle Change (GC/LC) Study for Diabetes Prevention.Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):609-15. doi: 10.1177/1740774511414159. Clin Trials. 2011. PMID: 22013171 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perceived impact of diabetes genetic risk testing among patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):568-73. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1960. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Diabetes Care. 2011. PMID: 21285385 Free PMC article.
-
Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients' ability to identify out-of-range test results.J Med Internet Res. 2014 Aug 8;16(8):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3241. J Med Internet Res. 2014. PMID: 25135688 Free PMC article.
-
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar;(199):1-941. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011. PMID: 23126607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Empirical relationships between numeracy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature.Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):310-325. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Patient Educ Couns. 2016. PMID: 26519238 Review.
Cited by
-
Pathways linking health literacy to self-care in diabetic patients with physical disabilities: A moderated mediation model.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0299971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299971. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38484001 Free PMC article.
-
Participant-guided development of bilingual genomic educational infographics for Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Phase IV study.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):306-316. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad207. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 37860921 Free PMC article.
-
Variability in conceptualizations and measurement of genetic literacy.PEC Innov. 2023 Mar 8;2:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100147. eCollection 2023 Dec. PEC Innov. 2023. PMID: 37214533 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating the uncertainty of precision cancer screening: The role of shared decision-making.PEC Innov. 2023 Jan 24;2:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100127. eCollection 2023 Dec. PEC Innov. 2023. PMID: 37214512 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and self-development education on type II diabetes mellitus patients' lifestyle.J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Nov 30;10:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_860_20. eCollection 2021. J Educ Health Promot. 2021. PMID: 35071640 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brower V. FDA to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(21):1610–1617. - PubMed
-
- McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:89–103. - PubMed
-
- Sanderson SC, Michie S. Genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility: potential impact on motivation to quit smoking. Clin Genet. 2007;71(6):501–510. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
