Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):606-15.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X11431608. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing

Jason L Vassy et al. Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes genetic risk testing might motivate at-risk patients to adopt diabetes prevention behaviors. However, the influence of literacy and numeracy on patient response to diabetes genetic risk is unknown.

Objective: The authors investigated the association of health literacy, genetic literacy, and health numeracy with patient responses to diabetes genetic risk.

Design: and Measurements Overweight patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes were recruited for a clinical trial of diabetes genetic risk testing. At baseline, participants predicted how their motivation for lifestyle modification to prevent diabetes might change in response to hypothetical scenarios of receiving "high" and "low" genetic risk results. Responses were analyzed according to participants' health literacy, genetic literacy, and health numeracy.

Results: Two-thirds (67%) of participants (n = 175) reported very high motivation to prevent diabetes. Despite high health literacy (92% at high school level), many participants had limited health numeracy (30%) and genetic literacy (38%). Almost all (98%) reported that high-risk genetic results would increase their motivation for lifestyle modification. In contrast, response to low-risk genetic results varied. Higher levels of health literacy (P = 0.04), genetic literacy (P = 0.02), and health numeracy (P = 0.02) were associated with an anticipated decrease in motivation for lifestyle modification in response to low-risk results.

Conclusions: While patients reported that high-risk genetic results would motivate them to adopt healthy lifestyle changes, response to low-risk results varied by patient numeracy and literacy. However, anticipated responses may not correlate with true behavior change. If future research justifies the clinical use of genetic testing to motivate behavior change, it may be important to assess how patient characteristics modify that motivational effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of responses to how motivation for lifestyle modification would change in hypothetical scenarios of high- and low-risk genetic results for type 2 diabetes, stratified by health literacy and health numeracy.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brower V. FDA to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(21):1610–1617. - PubMed
    1. McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:89–103. - PubMed
    1. Chao S, Roberts JS, Marteau TM, Silliman R, Cupples LA, Green RC. Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: the REVEAL Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008;22(1):94–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanderson SC, Michie S. Genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility: potential impact on motivation to quit smoking. Clin Genet. 2007;71(6):501–510. - PubMed
    1. Hamajima N, Suzuki K, Ito Y, Kondo T. Genotype announcement to Japanese smokers who attended a health checkup examination. J Epidemiol. 2006;16(1):45–47. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types