Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 5;511(1):8-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.068. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Stimulus dynamics increase the self-administration of compound visual and auditory stimuli

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Stimulus dynamics increase the self-administration of compound visual and auditory stimuli

Christopher M Olsen et al. Neurosci Lett. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Animals will acquire an operant task using sensory stimuli as a primary reinforcer. Many operant tasks use sensory stimuli as cues that are paired with other primary reinforcers. Recent studies have called attention to this potential confound, but there has not been a parametric assessment of the effect of stimulus variability on operant responding. We found that stimulus variability increased the amount of operant responding exhibited by mice, a phenomenon observed under both fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fixed ratio-1 responding for sensory stimuli. A. Active lever pressing during operant sessions for stimuli with different levels of variability. B. Mean of sessions 10–12 for each group in A. C. Lever accuracy for operant sessions shown in A. D. Mean lever accuracy of sessions 10–12 for each group in A. Points and bars represent mean ± SEM. N = 6–9 per group. ***p<0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progressive ratio responding for sensory stimuli. A. Between-groups comparison: mice were tested for progressive ratio responding for the same stimulus type as for FR-1. B. Within-groups comparison: mice that responded for type 5 stimuli in FR-1 sessions were subsequently tested for PR responding for all 5 stimulus types. Bars represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnes GW, Baron A. Stimulus complexity and sensory reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961;54:466–469. - PubMed
    1. Besheer J, Jensen HC, Bevins RA. Dopamine antagonism in a novel-object recognition and a novel-object place conditioning preparation with rats. Behav Brain Res. 1999;103:35–44. - PubMed
    1. Bevins RA, Bardo MT. Conditioned increase in place preference by access to novel objects: antagonism by MK-801. Behav Brain Res. 1999;99:53–60. - PubMed
    1. Blatter K, Schultz W. Rewarding properties of visual stimuli. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168:541–546. - PubMed
    1. Butler RA. The responsiveness of Rhesus monkeys to motion pictures. J Genet Psychol. 1961;98:239–245. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources