Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 18;2(1):e000665.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000665. Print 2012.

CareTrack Australia: Assessing the Appropriateness of Adult Healthcare: Protocol for a Retrospective Medical Record Review

Affiliations
Free PMC article

CareTrack Australia: Assessing the Appropriateness of Adult Healthcare: Protocol for a Retrospective Medical Record Review

Tamara D Hunt et al. BMJ Open. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction In recent years in keeping with international best practice, clinical guidelines for common conditions have been developed, endorsed and disseminated by peak national and professional bodies. Yet evidence suggests that there remain considerable gaps between the care that is regarded as appropriate by such guidelines and the care received by patients. With an ageing population and increasing treatment options and expectations, healthcare is likely to become unaffordable unless more appropriate care is provided. This paper describes a study protocol that seeks to determine the percentage of healthcare encounters in which patients receive appropriate care for 22 common clinical conditions and the reasons why variations exist from the perspectives of both patients and providers. Methods/design A random stratified sample of at least 1000 eligible participants will be recruited from a representative cross section of the adult Australian population. Participants' medical records from the years 2009 and 2010 will be audited to assess the appropriateness of the care received for 22 common clinical conditions by determining the percentage of healthcare encounters at which the care provided was concordant with a set of 522 indicators of care, developed for these conditions by a panel of 43 disease experts. The knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of participants and healthcare providers will be examined through interviews and questionnaires to understand the factors influencing variations in care. Ethics and dissemination Primary ethics approvals were sought and obtained from the Hunter New England Local Health Network. The authors will submit the results of the study to a relevant journal as well as undertaking oral presentations to researchers, clinicians and policymakers.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The components and aims of CareTrack Australia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The process to recruit participants and undertake medical record reviews. CATI, Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. HCP = Healthcare provider

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 10 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Australia's health 2010. Australia's health series, no 12 2010, Cat. no. AUS 122. AIHW, Canberra, 2010
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Health system expenditure on disease and injury in Australia, 2004-05. Health and Welfare Expenditure Series 2010, No 36:Cat No HSE-87. AIHW, Canberra, 2010
    1. National Health Priority Action Council: National Chronic Disease Strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006
    1. Carey M, Buchan H, Sanson-Fisher R. The cycle of change: implementing best-evidence clinical practice. Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:37–43 - PubMed
    1. Fukuda H, Imanaka Y, Ishizaki T, et al. Change in clinical practice after publication of guidelines on breast cancer treatment. Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:372–8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback