Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012:2012:173829.
doi: 10.1100/2012/173829. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

A critical view of current state of phytotechnologies to remediate soils: still a promising tool?

Affiliations
Review

A critical view of current state of phytotechnologies to remediate soils: still a promising tool?

Héctor M Conesa et al. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012.

Abstract

Phytotechnologies are often shown as an emerging tool to remediate contaminated soils. Research in this field has resulted in many important findings relating to plant and soil sciences. However, there have been scant private and public investments and little commercial success with this technology. Here, we investigate the barriers to the adoption of phytotechnologies and determine whether it is still a fertile area for future research. The terminology used in phytotechnologies includes a confusing mish-mash of terms relating to concepts and processes increasing the difficulty of developing a unique commercial image. We argue that the commercial success of phytotechnologies depends on the generation of valuable biomass on contaminated land, rather than a pure remediation technique that may not compare favourably with the costs of inaction or alternative technologies. Valuable biomass includes timber, bioenergy, feedstock for pyrolosis, biofortified products, or ecologically important species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Current classification of most frequently used phytotechnologies for soil remediation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phytostabilization and phytoextraction application. Current and future development.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scheme of evaluation steps in a project remediation site.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phytoremediation decision tree.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GACGC (German Advisory Council on Global Change) World in Transition: The Threat to Soils. Bonn, Germany: Economica Verlag GmbH; 1994.
    1. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Brussels, Belgium: European Commision; 2002. (COM(2002) 179 final).
    1. Bundesrat S. 814.12 Verordnung vom 1. Juli 1998 über Belastungen des Bodens (VBBo) Switzerland: 1998.
    1. MHSPE (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment) Netherlands: Circular on Target Values and Intervention Values for Soil Remediation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment; 2000.
    1. BOE (Boletín Oficial del Estado) Real Decreto 9/2005, de 14 de enero, por el que se establece la relación de actividades potencialmente contaminantes del suelo y los criterios y estándares para la declaración de suelos contaminados. (BOE no. 15 de 18.01.05), pp. 1833–1843, 2005. Spain. (in Spanish)

Publication types