Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Feb;35(2):446-54.
doi: 10.2337/dc11-1465.

Quantifying the effect of metformin treatment and dose on glycemic control

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Quantifying the effect of metformin treatment and dose on glycemic control

Jennifer A Hirst et al. Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Metformin is the first-line oral medication recommended for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. We reviewed the literature to quantify the effect of metformin treatment on glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels in all types of diabetes and examine the impact of differing doses on glycemic control.

Research design and methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1950 to June 2010 for trials of at least 12 weeks' duration in which diabetic patients were treated with either metformin monotherapy or as an add-on therapy. Data on change in HbA(1c) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Data from dose-comparison trials were separately pooled.

Results: A total of 35 trials were identified for the main analysis and 7 for the dose-comparison analysis. Metformin monotherapy lowered HbA(1c) by 1.12% (95% CI 0.92-1.32; I(2) = 80%) versus placebo, metformin added to oral therapy lowered HbA(1c) by 0.95% (0.77-1.13; I(2) = 77%) versus placebo added to oral therapy, and metformin added to insulin therapy lowered HbA(1c) by 0.60% (0.30-0.91; I(2) = 79.8%) versus insulin only. There was a significantly greater reduction in HbA(1c) using higher doses of metformin compared with lower doses of metformin with no significant increase in side effects.

Conclusions: Evidence supports the effectiveness of metformin therapy in a clinically important lowering of HbA(1c) used as monotherapy and in combination with other therapeutic agents. There is potential for using higher doses of metformin to maximize glycemic control in diabetic patients without increasing gastrointestinal effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean difference in change in HbA1c of metformin treatment versus comparator (boxes) and pooled estimates (diamonds) calculated by the random-effects DerSimonian and Laird method, stratified by metformin monotherapy and metformin added to an oral antidiabetes medication. Horizontal bars and diamond widths denote 95% CIs, and box sizes indicate relative weight in the analysis. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean difference in change in HbA1c of metformin added on to insulin versus placebo and insulin comparator (boxes) and pooled estimates (diamonds) calculated by the random-effects DerSimonian and Laird method, stratified by type of diabetes. Horizontal bars and diamond widths denote 95% CIs, and box sizes indicate relative weight in the analysis. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean difference (boxes) in change in HbA1c of high dose metformin, combining trial arms allocated to at least 2,000 mg metformin, versus low dose metformin, combining trial arms allocated to 1,000–1,500 mg metformin, showing pooled estimates (diamonds) calculated by the random-effects DerSimonian and Laird method. Horizontal bars and diamond widths denote 95% CIs, and box sizes indicate relative weight in the analysis. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GC, Sehgal NL, Moloney RM, Stafford RS. National trends in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1994-2007. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2088–2094 - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Health Service. Prescribing for diabetes in England: 2004/5 to 2009/10 [article online], 2010. Available from http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/Primary%20Care/Prescriptions/... Accessed 5 December 2011
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. ; American Diabetes Association; European Association for the Study of Diabetes Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 2009;52:17–30 - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update) [article online], 2008. Available from http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11983/40803/40803.pdf Accessed 5 December 2011
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577–1589 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms